Long-Term Study of Medical School Demographics Shows “Persistent Failure” to Improve Diversity

Last month, the New England Journal of Medicine published a forty-year review of medical school demographics. The analysis looked at both gender and racial/ethnic diversity within the medical student body, and found a “persistent failure to substantially improve racial and ethnic diversity.” Using data from 1978 to 2019, the study showed striking movement resulting in gender parity within medical schools, but no significant change in the proportions of underrepresented ethnic and racial groups. In particular, the number of Black men and Native American and Alaskan men and women have declined over the study period.

While American Medical Schools have often spoken of the need for a diverse physician workforce that reflects the nation’s population, the numbers produced by the multi-decade study suggest that recruiting efforts have not been effective. Black women made a moderate increase over the 40-year study period, growing from 2.2 percent of students in 1978 to 4.4 percent in 2019. But Black males actually saw a negative change. In 1978, Black men made up 3.1 percent of the student body, but just 2.9 percent in 2019. Additionally, the analysis points out the critical role that historically black universities play in educating the Black physician workforce; 15 percent of all Black men enrolled in medical school are educated at a historically Black medical school. Excluding these programs, Black men would have made up just 2.4 percent of the student body throughout the entirety of the study period. Similarly, men and women identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native or as Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander made up less than 1 percent of medical students. 

And progress in diversity recruiting remains slow. According to a Kaplan Medical Admissions Officers survey, just 48 percent of medical schools reported that they have a specific program in place to recruit Black students. The survey, which included 58 accredited medical schools across North America, also asked admissions officers to grade medical schools (as a whole), on their work to recruit and admit a diverse array of students and just 7 percent rewarded medical schools with an “A”. Most responses suggest that there is some, or perhaps considerable work to be done, with 41 percent choosing the grade of B, 38 percent a C, and 14 percent a D or F.

Kaplan does point out, however, that its survey results follow an optimistic report from the Association of American Medical Colleges, which shows an increase in the number of Black first-year students in 2020: 9.5 percent of first-year medical students, up from 8.8 percent the previous year. Additionally, the number of Black men entering their first year of medical school increased 12.2 percent from the previous year, and total enrollment among Black men increased by 6.2 percent. The number of American Indian or Alaska Native first year students increased by 7.8 percent.

In conversation with Stat News about the long-term demographic study, Norma Poll-Hunter, Senior Director of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion for the AAMC expressed her mixed emotions about the current spotlight on diversity efforts, “Even the National Academies have called this an American crisis and that’s not an overstatement. This is important for the health of our nation. On one hand, we feel we’ve been saying this for how long and people are finally paying attention, at the same time, we now have so many allies and we need to leverage this moment for the long haul.”

Law Schools See Spike in Applicants

The law school application surge is real. Data released on April 22, 2021 by the Law School Admissions Council (LSAC) shows that applicants for the 2021-2022 school year are up 20.0 percent compared to the same date last year, and up 15.8 percent compared to two years ago. The data also shows that applicants, likely in response to uncertain conditions, are applying to more schools, as the number of submitted applications is up 31.6 percent compared to last year, and up 27.9 percent compared to two years ago.

When early figures emerged showing a jump in applications for the upcoming school year, some speculated that applicants submitted their materials early due to COVID-19 lockdowns. However, at this point in the admissions cycle, the number of applicants for the 2021 school year, which still has weeks remaining for some schools, already exceeds the total number of 2020 applicants. Additionally, as of April 21st, there are well over 10, 000 more applicants in 2021 than there were at the same time in 2020. According to law.com, if these trends continue, this is likely to be the largest applicant pool since 2011.

The quality of this year’s applicants is also proving formidable. The number of students receiving top scores on the LSAT increased significantly compared to last year; applicants reporting scores between 175 to 180 on the LSAT doubled, jumping from 721 to 1,442. The number who scored between 170 to 174 also increased by 54.1 percent, and 28 percent more applicants reported scores in the bands 160 to 164 and 165 to 169.

Also worthy of note is that the increase in applications is consistent across most racial groups. The number of Black/African American, White, and Hispanic/Latino applicants all increased by about 20 percent this year compared to last (22.3 percent, 20.8 percent, and 20.6 percent respectively). The largest spike, 57.2 percent, comes from Puerto Rican applicants followed by Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islanders at 31.7 percent. The number of Asian applicants increased, but by a smaller percentage than average at 13.7 percent. A prepared statement put forth by LSAC described these increases with optimism, “We are seeing strength across all demographic groups and locations. This year looks good in terms of having a robust and diverse legal education pipeline of candidates eager to use the law to create a better world. That’s good for our society.”

Admissions officers have struggled over how to react to the influx of highly qualified candidates this cycle. Many schools expanded their wait lists and made fewer outright acceptances. Notre Dame Law School, despite making fewer admissions offers, made headlines over its decision to offer admitted students seats in its class on a “first come, first served” basis to avoid over-enrollment. On April 6, 2021, Notre Dame’s admissions officers told admitted students that the incoming class was 67 percent full and that students would need to reserve their seat with a deposit or risk losing it. Just a few hours later, the admissions team informed students that the class was at 80 percent capacity and, by the end of the day, announced that all seats had been filled and the remaining students who had been admitted would be moved to a “continued interest” list.

While there are likely many reasons behind the jump in applications, law.com notes that admissions officers and consultants are pointing to both political and economic events of the past years, including: police killings of African Americans and the resulting national focus on racial inequalities, Trump’s presidency, national discourse on immigration policy, as well as the economic impact of coronavirus and the difficulty of finding strong entry-level employment. The article also notes the added convenience of registering and taking the LSAT-flex.

Most likely, the highly competitive nature of this admissions cycle will carry over into next year as many competitive applicants unable to find a seat among their top-choice schools, will reapply in the fall. According to law.com, over 28,000 have already registered to take the June LSAT with weeks left in the registration period.

Covid Crisis Brings Attention to the Need for Humanities in Medical School Curriculum

Over the weekend, The New York Times published an opinion piece urging medical schools to more fully integrate humanities courses and themes into their curriculum. The op-ed, written by Dr. Molly Worthen, a historian at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, notes that amidst the covid crisis and student transitions to distance learning, humanities classes proliferated. Worthen discusses the usefulness of these topics when addressing questions relevant to modern healthcare. “This is the moment for champions of the medical humanities to strike. To make sense of disproportionate Covid death rates in Black and Latino communities or white evangelicals’ vaccine resistance, researchers need to consider everything from the history of redlining to theologies of God’s judgment. They cannot afford to stay in highly specialized lanes or rely solely on the familiar quantitative methods of the medical sciences.”

Dr. Worthen’s piece is just the latest among recent efforts in the healthcare community to call attention to the benefits that humanities and the arts provide within the medical curriculum. Last year, the AAMC published a report titled, The Fundamental Role of the Arts and Humanities in Medical Education. The report identified four aspects of medical training that are improved by the integration of the arts and humanities: 1) Mastering skills – improving clinical care capabilities (e.g., case presentation, critical thinking); 2) Taking perspective – showcasing the sometimes contradictory perspectives of patients and others in clinical situations; 3) Personal insight – nurturing reflection and self-understanding to promote personal wellbeing and resilience; and 4) Social advocacy – urging students to assess and improve norms when identifying and rectifying potential inequities and injustices within health care.

While the report found that most medical schools have, to varying extents, incorporated arts and humanities into their curriculums, the potential benefits have yet to be fully realized because of inconsistencies. The report details “significant variation in the content, curricula integration, teaching methods, and evaluation methods” in MD programs, and recommends ways they could both improve and assess the benefits. A few of the recommendations direct medical schools to demonstrate the linkages between humanities coursework and core physician competencies, as well as increase the collaboration between faculty, students, patients, and partners in the arts and humanities to create and implement programs.

The report also details a few of the noteworthy humanities programs currently offered in medical schools.

-          Jazz and the Art of Medicine at Penn State: This four-week elective is offered to senior-level students. Students are asked to listen to jazz music, the give and take between the lead and accompanying musicians, then relate it to standard conversations facilitated by physicians with patients. At its core, the course is about how to listen and respond, rather than simply going through the motions. Students practice these improvisational techniques in clinical visits, which allows them to improve their listening and response skills while under real time constraints. The students are also encouraged to play to their strengths and thoughtfully and proactively build their communication style as care providers. A study that compared 30 of the students to a control group showed that they displayed statistically significant and meaningful gains in adaptability and listening.

-          My Life, My Story at VA Boston Healthcare System: This program is integrated into students’ clinical work, though it does require additional time outside of standard rounds. Students work with military veterans to help them compose a personal narrative which, with the patient’s permission, is entered into their electronic medical record. This promotes the idea of patient-centered care and demonstrates to the medical students the benefits of knowing and understanding a patient as a complex human being. In qualitative assessments, students described the power of the exercise as being the “best thing they’ve done in medical school,” with many stating that they wish they knew more of their patients so intimately.

-          Program in Bioethics and Film at Stanford: Events are integrated throughout the curriculum. Students watch documentaries and films about health issues and medical care. Faculty then lead small group discussions about how gaining additional insight into people’s lives and experiences may drive a physician’s thinking when working with patients, as well as in their role as care providers in a community. These small groups also delve into topics in medical ethics, culture and perspective, and communication. While the incorporation of the film events throughout the curriculum make it difficult to measure the program’s affect, faculty say that they can see the impact on students by the quality of the discussions and student conversations afterwards.

In 2019 Richard Ratzan, MD published a piece in JAMA, How to Fix the Premedical Curriculum – Another Try, in which he described the importance of taking humanities courses as a prerequisite for understanding the human condition, and thus medicine. He recommended that medical school admissions officers boldly look for students who majored in the humanities, with science classes as options on the side. He wrote, “... No premed majors need apply; the science training will come after acceptance.” While this provocative stance has not been wholly accepted by the medical community, the many proponents of the medical humanities are gaining attention. Admissions committees are looking for more well-rounded students who understand that there are many lenses through which a physician must look to see, hear, and heal a patient. Dr. Worthen’s editorial stated it potently, “… medicine is not a science but an art that uses science as one of many tools … The scale of the Covid crisis should force both scientists and humanists to ask new questions, to realize how much they don’t know — and perhaps to learn more from one another.”

Student Loan Forgiveness Receives New Attention Under the Biden Administration

Debt is top of mind for graduate students. A Bloomberg Businessweek survey found that among 2018 graduates of prestigious MBA programs, almost half had borrowed at least $100,000 to finance the degree. The American Medical Association has long advocated for legislative action intended to ease the burden of debt on medical providers, and the American Bar Association released a report in 2020 detailing the negative impact of student debt on young lawyers’ mental health and calling for greater legislative advocacy on students’ behalf.

Late last week, when President Biden signed into law a covid relief package, he also removed a critical impediment to enacting broad-based student debt forgiveness. The bill contains a provision that allows any loan cancellation acquired between December 31, 2020 and January 1, 2026 to be excluded from taxable income. Previously, debt forgiveness (including Public Service Loan Forgiveness) was treated as additional income and taxed as such, with few exceptions. This update ensures that recipients of student debt relief are not left with large tax liabilities and are also not thrust into new tax brackets, with associated implications, due to debt cancellation.  

The counting of debt forgiveness dollars towards taxable income was a primary obstacle to broad student loan forgiveness programs. With the update now signed into law, Congressional Democrats led by Elizabeth Warren and Chuck Schumer, as well as 17 state attorneys general and consumer rights advocates are calling on President Biden to take executive action to cancel $50,000 in federal student debt per borrower. Despite this pressure, the President does not support loan forgiveness at this amount for every borrower, which he directly expressed in a CNN Town Hall last month, as it would aid people who attended elite schools or obtained professional graduate degrees and have strong repayment prospects. The Biden Administration has noted that cancelling student loans above $10,000 should be dependent on the type of loan and current income of the recipient. The President does, however, support $10,000 in blanket, federal student loan forgiveness, and he has urged Congress to legislate this action. Legislative action, he argues, will make it harder to undo. Meanwhile, he has ordered a Department of Justice review to clarify if he has the authority to cancel student loan debt via executive action. This review will be done with the White House Domestic Policy Cancel, who will also consider the best way to target loan cancellation.

While the loan forgiveness policies under consideration would not directly benefit borrowers with private or commercially held student loans, those borrowers could still benefit from the tax relief provision included in the covid relief bill. Marketwatch notes that it may help borrowers benefit from current loan relief options provided by public or private lenders as a response to the pandemic.

In an interview on student debt with the AMA, Alex Macielak, who works in student-loan refinancing, urged students to pay attention to the political discourse, “There’s a new administration. Student-loan debt is a hot topic, ... There’s been talk about forgiving loans for some people. However, how much, who would be eligible, and other important details are still in doubt. So, monitor the legislation and debate, because student loans are consistently evolving.”

Prospective MBAs, Particularly Women, Show More Interest in Flexible and Online MBA Programs

After a period of stagnation, MBA applications are on the rise. Not only do MBA programs tend to be counter-cyclical to economic growth, but, as The Economist notes, pivots made by MBA programs amidst the global pandemic have boosted their relevance. In addition to increased flexibility in the admissions process, schools have improved their online and flexible MBA offerings. Vijay Govindarajan of Dartmouth College’s Tuck School of Business, is quoted in The Economist article, explaining that rather than being “giant killers,” digital technology has allowed prestigious schools to “ensure their gold-plated MBA programmes shine even brighter.”

The CarringtonCrisp Consultancy confirmed these trends, finding increased interest in online and flexible MBA programs among prospective MBA applicants in their annual survey results. The results showed that 70 percent of respondents are more likely to apply to an MBA program now than they were a year ago. And, 46 percent are now seeking a form of flexible study. Over three-quarters, 78 percent, agreed that they are more likely to consider a school with flexible study options in its MBA program. Another 70 percent said that they are more likely to consider studying for all or most of their MBA online. 

When the CarringtonCrisp survey asked directly about respondents’ preferred method of study, just 15.5 percent selected “online,” falling behind the traditional two-year (28 percent), one-year (23 percent), and part-time (22 percent) programs. However, online study saw a significant year-over-year increase of 4 percentage points, while other methods held relatively steady or dropped. Additionally, a break-down by gender showed that women’s interest in online learning outpaced men’s; 19 percent of women selected online learning as their preferred method compared to 13.2 percent of men. Similarly, while over one-third of men said that they preferred the traditional two-year MBA program (34.7 percent), fewer than a quarter of women (21.5 percent) did, a smaller percentage than those who prefer full-time one-year (24.0 percent) or part-time (23.0 percent) programs.

The 2020 GMAC Application Trends Survey showed similarly large gains for flexible and online MBA programs. Globally, the survey showed large year-over-year increases in applications for the part-time self-paced MBA (53.0 percent), flexible MBA (48.6 percent), and online MBA (43.5 percent). And in the U.S., while 72 percent of full-time two-year MBA programs reported an increase in applications, 86 percent of online MBA programs reported growth in applications (up from 50 percent of programs in 2019 and 36 percent in 2018). Once again, the growth was driven by female candidates with 85 percent of online programs reporting an increase in female applicants, compared to 74 percent reporting increases in male applicants.

AAMC Physician Workforce Report Shows an Increasing Number of Women, Physicians Nearing Retirement, and Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine

The proportion of women within the active physician workforce continues to increase, as does the proportion of those nearing retirement age and those with a Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) degree.  Late last month the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) released its 2020 Physician Specialty Report, which provides demographic and specialty trends within the active physician and resident/fellow workforces. It is important to note that the data used to populate the 2020 report was reflective of the 2019 physician workforce.

Active Physicians

In 2019, over one-third of active physicians were women (36.3 percent); this percentage has been steadily rising since 2007 when women made up just over a quarter of the workforce (28.3 percent). This growth reflects the steady increase in female medical students, with women making up the majority (50.5 percent) in medical school for the first time in 2019. The report notes, however, that women still tend to remain concentrated in specialties pertaining to women and children, including pediatrics (64.3 percent), obstetrics and gynecology (58.9 percent), and pediatric hematology/oncology (55.1 percent), and have marginal representation elsewhere. Women make up less than a quarter of the physician workforce in a great number of specialties, including various surgery sub-specialties where the number ranges from 22 percent in general surgery to just 5.8 percent in orthopedic surgery. About ten percent of physicians in pulmonary disease (12.3 percent) and urology (9.5 percent) are female. There are no specialties where male physicians make up less than 35 percent of the workforce.

Just under half of the physicians were 55 and over (44.9 percent) in 2019, which is a marginal increase from 44.1 percent in 2017 but a more significant increase from 37.6 percent in 2007. Over 50 percent of the following specialties are made up of physicians aged 55 and over: preventative medicine (69.6 percent), thoracic surgery (60.1 percent), orthopedic surgery (57.1 percent), and urology (50.5 percent). Several of the specialties which are populated with older doctors also have the highest percentages of males, and conversely several of those with the lowest percentage of older doctors are among the highest in female doctors.

Another slow-moving trend is the increase in practicing physicians with a DO degree. In 2019, 8.2 percent of physicians held the DO degree, while U.S. MDs made up 66.1 percent of the workforce and international medical degrees made up 24.7 percent. This is subtle, but real growth from 2007, when 69.5 percent of physicians held a U.S. MD, 24 percent held an international medical degree, and just 6.5 percent held a DO. In one of the fastest growing specialties, sports medicine, 18.9 percent of practicing physicians were DOs in 2019.

Residents and Fellows

Among the Residents and Fellows in 2019, 45.8 percent were women, like the 2017 figure (45.6 percent), and up slightly from 44.6 percent in 2007. As seen in the physician workforce, female residents/fellows tend to pursue the care of women and children in high percentages, with obstetrics and gynecology (83.8 percent), neonatal-perinatal medicine (74.9 percent), and pediatrics coming in at the top (72.4 percent). However, large percentages of women are also pursuing specialties in endocrinology (70.8 percent), allergy/immunology (68.2 percent), and geriatrics (67.8 percent).

Just as the percentage of DO graduates increased within the active physician workforce, it was also more prominent within the resident/fellow population. In 2019, 15.7 percent of the resident/fellow workforce had a DO degree, an increase from 12.5 percent in 2017 and 6.4 percent in 2007. The percentage of U.S. MDs showed a relative decline over the same period, with 61.1 percent of the 2019 population compared to 65.9 percent in 2007; similarly, international medical school graduates declined from 27.4 percent of the resident/fellow population in 2007 to 23.1 percent in 2019.

Business Schools Opting Out of Rankings Due to Pandemic

The Economist just published its latest MBA ranking, which Poets & Quants deemed, “the strangest list of the best business schools ever to be published.” European business schools IESE and HEC topped this year’s list, jumping up from their 2019 ranks of 10 and 3 respectively; however, 15 of the previously top 25 ranked schools declined to participate in this year’s ranking. In total, 49 out of the 165 schools invited to submit data either declined or were deemed ineligible and another 13 opted not to send the associated survey to their students or alumni. Among the 62 were some of the world’s most prestigious programs including Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, INSEAD, London Business School, CEIBS, Cornell, Dartmouth, and Duke.

The Economist’s resulting top ten, comprised of five U.S. and five European programs, included both expected and unexpected schools. The U.S. schools named in the top ten were Michigan Ross ranked third (up six spots from 2019), NYU Stern ranked fourth (+13), Georgia Tech Scheller ranked fifth (+18), University of Washington Foster ranked eighth (+12), and Carnegie Mellon Tepper ranked tenth (+22).  Most of the returning schools that opted into this year’s ranking saw significant positive momentum: 85 percent of schools that participated in 2019 and 2021 saw double-digit improvements in their rankings. Additionally, 41 of the top 50 (excluding two first-time participants) saw their rank increase by at least ten spots, and 24 of those improved by 20 spots or more.

The ranking, which was published despite GMAC’s request to the media to take a hiatus during the pandemic, comes during a tumultuous time for business schools worldwide. The logistical and economic effects of COVID-19 have impacted data typically included in ranking algorithms. Correspondingly, only 28 percent of business schools plan to participate in all MBA rankings this year according to Kaplan survey results published last week. The Kaplan survey, taken in October, asked admissions officers from 90 U.S. business schools, including 14 of the top 50 programs (ranked by U.S. News & World Report), about their plans to participate in rankings this academic year. While just 10 percent responded that they did not plan to participate in any MBA rankings, almost two-thirds (62 percent) said that they only planned to participate in some rankings.

Brian Carlidge, Vice President of Admissions at Kaplan, interpreted the results, saying that, “The majority of business schools have made their admissions processes more flexible, including making the GMAT or GRE optional, so many schools are lacking in test score data this year. Another major data point that goes into the rankings is job placement rate, and with the economy struggling as it is, it’s likely that it wasn’t as easy for Class of 2020 graduates to find employment as it was for Class of 2019 graduates. While many business schools are still reporting this data point for transparency, it’s also likely that others are reluctant to publicize it… With so much tumult, it’s hard to get a clear picture of where each business school lands. With so many top MBA programs not participating this year, it may make the rankings released in 2021 feel much less potent and relevant for aspiring business school students than in years past.”

Surge in Medical School Applications Attributed to the “Fauci Effect” and Virtual Interviews

In September we shared that applications to medical school had risen significantly compared to the same period last year, with both the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) and the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) reporting double-digit increases. Last week, MedPage Today confirmed that the upward trend in applications has held throughout the application season with AAMC applications, now closed, up 18 percent over the previous cycle and AACOM schools up 19 percent over the same period last year and up 7 percent over last year’s total with two months remaining in the admissions cycle.

The increase in application volume is significantly larger than recent annual increases (less than 6 percent), which suggests this year’s cycle will be more competitive. Geoffrey Young, PhD, AAMC's Senior Director of Student Affairs and Programs, estimated that just 18 percent of applicants will be accepted to AAMC schools this year. Young, along with Jayme Bograd, AACOM's Director of Application Services, Recruitment, and Student Affairs, via MedPage Today, also suggest that the large number of applicants could have an impact on future application cycles. Noting that this cycle included a similar percentage of re-applicants to previous years, both Young and Bograd agree that, if the rate holds, next year may also bring a larger number of applicants.

Medical school admissions officers have attributed this year’s application uptick to the “Fauci Effect.” Kristen Goodell, Associate Dean of Admissions at the Boston University School of Medicine, which reported a staggering 27 percent increase in applications, told NPR last month that "It may have a lot to do with the fact that people look at Anthony Fauci, look at the doctors in their community and say, 'You know, that is amazing. This is a way for me to make a difference.'"

Young, however, questions the “Fauci Effect,” pointing out that competitive medical school applicants typically spend years amassing a portfolio of educational and extracurricular experiences, rather than making an impulse decision to submit. And Bograd points out that the average age of applicants is the same this year (23.9) as it was last year, suggesting that it was not simply due to applicants opting out of a gap year. Rather, MedPage’s sources, including Young and Bograd, look to a variety of anecdotal factors that may have contributed to this year’s larger number of applicants. Both AAMC and AACOM schools use of virtual interviews significantly reduced the cost burden on applicants. Relatedly, not having to travel for interviews may have allowed applicants to apply to a wider range of schools. Additionally, osteopathic schools have increased program awareness efforts with AACOM, hosting more open houses than usual, virtually, and increasing scholarship funds. And a new DO school in Utah is accepting applications for its first class, while a few other schools have been able to expand their class sizes.

15-Year Law School Experience Study Shows Changes in Student Demographics and Debt, Consistency in Student Satisfaction with Legal Education

Last week the Law School Survey of Student Engagement (LSSSE) put out a longitudinal study examining the law school experience over the last 15 years. Key findings include some areas of significant change, including increases in student diversity, growing student debt, and improvements in student learning outcomes, but also consistency in topics including job expectations and overall satisfaction with legal education. The survey includes responses from over 70,000 students at 248 law schools who participated in LSSSE surveys in 2004, 2009, 2014, and 2019.

Demographics

Between 2004 and 2019 student demographics shifted with proportionately more students of color and fewer White students; the share of White students decreased from 83 percent to 70 percent, while the percentages of Multiracial (+8 percentage points), Black (+2), and Latinx (+3) students increased. The percentage of Asian Americans stayed the same at 6 percent. In 2004, women held a slight majority of the student population at 51 percent, which increased to 56 percent in 2019.

The average age of law students decreased slightly from 29 in 2004 to 27 in 2019. The largest changes were evident in the number of respondents under the age of 23, which made up 1 percent of the population in 2004 and jumped to 9 percent in 2019, as well as in the number of respondents between the ages of 26 to 30, which decreased from 37 percent in 2004 to 28 percent in 2019.

Finally, average LSAT scores and undergraduate GPAs were slightly lower in 2019 compared to 2004. In 2019, fewer students scored above 161 on the LSAT (15 percent in 2019, 21 percent in 2004), slightly fewer scored between 150-160 (51 percent v. 53 percent), and a higher percentage reported scoring below 150 (34 percent v. 26 percent). Similarly, reported undergraduate GPAs were lower amongst the 2019 respondents compared to those in 2004; in 2019, 40 percent reported a 3.50 and above (-2 percentage points from 2004), 38 percent reported a 3.00-3.49 (-4 from 2004), 17 percent reported a 2.50-2.99 (+3), and 5 percent reported a 2.49 or below (+3).

Debt

The population expecting to pay over $100,000 in student debt has risen significantly since 2004, with a spike occurring in 2009. In 2004, 18 percent of students expected to owe more than $100,000 in student debt (5.1 percent for public law schools, 22 percent for private). In 2009 that number more than doubled to 40 percent, and then increased to 43 percent in 2014. In 2019, 39 percent expected to owe more than $100,000 (27 percent in public law schools and 46 percent for private).

While the percentage of students expecting significant debt has increased from 2004 across all races, the number of Black and Latinx facing significant debt has grown more sharply when compared to White or Asian American students over the same time-period. In 2004, 18 percent of White students, 21 percent of Black students, and 22 percent of Latinx students expected to owe over $100,000. In 2019, 35 percent of White students, 56 percent of Black students, and 53 percent of Latinx had the same expectation.

Learning Outcomes

Students in 2019 were more positive about their law school’s contribution to various learning outcomes than in previous years.

• 45 percent responded that law school contributed to their understanding people of other racial/ethnic backgrounds, compared to 23 percent in 2004

• 58 percent responded that law school contributed to developing a personal code of values and ethics, compared to 43 percent in 2004

• 60 percent responded that law school contributed to solving complex real-world problems, compared to 45 percent in 2004

• 54 percent responded that law school contributed to developing clearer career goals, compared to 37 percent in 2004.

Job Expectations

Respondents in 2004 and 2019 responded very similarly in terms of job expectations with differences of only an occasional percentage point for the various job types: Business and Industry, Government Agency, Public Interest Group, Private Firm, and other. However, a notable difference was apparent within the private firm category. In 2004, 17 percent expected to join a small firm with less than 10 attorneys, 19 percent expected to join a mid-size firm with 10-50 attorneys, and 13 percent expected to join a large firm with more than 50 attorneys. In 2019, just 8 percent expected to join a small firm, 15 percent a mid-size firm, and 22 percent a large firm.

Law School Satisfaction

With slight variations, law school students are generally likely to rate their experience as Excellent or Good; responses ranged from 81 percent positive (2019) to 84 percent positive (2009) over the four survey years. Interestingly, while respondents rated their relationships with faculty members relatively consistently over time (78 percent positive in 2004, 76 percent in 2019), students rated their relationships with other students lower in 2019 (81 percent positive in 2004, 76 percent in 2019).

While Black women were the least likely to rate their law school experience positively in both 2004 and 2019, the percent positive did increase from 70 percent in 2004 to 75 percent in 2019. Asian American Women and Black Men saw the largest increases in positive ratings with 6 percentage point increases from 2004 to 2019 (79 percent and 85 percent in 2019, respectively).

Across sub-categories that measured satisfaction with academic advising, career counseling, personal counseling, and job search help, the numbers in each category increased slightly across the four survey years. In 2019, respondents were most positive on academic advising (71 percent positive) and reported the least satisfaction with job search help (66 percent positive). Additionally, students are more likely to take advantage of these offerings than in previous years; over 90 percent of students reported using academic advising and planning, and career counseling services, 84 percent used job search help, and 62 percent used personal counseling.

Global Pandemic Spurs Demand for Graduate Management Education Worldwide

The Graduate Management Admissions Council (GMAC) just released its 2020 application trends survey report, The Global Demand for Graduate Management Education. The survey data, which was collected over an extended period to include pandemic-related effects, shows that while demand for business education is up, matriculation is slightly down.

The findings reflected the unusual nature of the 2020 application season during which many business schools introduced greater flexibility—the extension of deadlines and liberal deferral policies—into the admissions process. As such, schools, both international and domestic, reported that the 2020 admissions cycle brought an increase in the number of applications received, as well as acceptance rates, but also a corresponding increase in deferral rates and a decrease in yield when compared to the 2019 cycle.

In the US, over two-thirds of MBA programs (70 percent) reported an increase in application volume for the 2020 application period compared to the prior year (only one-third of programs reported increases in 2019). But despite increased application volumes, the median acceptance rate in 2020 was slightly higher than in 2019 (76 percent and 74 percent, respectively). And the median deferral rate—the result of schools’ more lenient policies as applicants grappled with obtaining visas, online schooling, and travel amid COVID-19—doubled from three percent in 2019 to six percent in 2020. Both Canadian and European MBA programs reported even higher median deferral rates of 11 percent, likely due to their higher numbers of international applicants, who were three times more likely to defer than their domestic counterparts (15 percent and 5 percent, respectively). Median yield rates in the US decreased by two percentage points between 2019 and 2020 (68 percent and 66 percent, respectively).

It remains to be seen how program acceptance rates for the upcoming cycle will be impacted as students who chose to defer their start to next year begin enrolling. It is important to note, however, that Harvard Business School just announced plans to matriculate the largest MBA cohorts in its history over the next two years (approximately 1,000 students each year). In a blog post announcing the plan, Chad Losee, Managing Director of MBA Admissions and Financial Aid, wrote, “In April, when we announced our one-time deferral policy for those admitted to the Class of 2022, we were already thinking ahead to those of you applying in the next two years. We did not want you to be disadvantaged by spots already reserved for those who deferred from the Class of 2022.”

Though other elite programs have not yet made similar announcements, they may follow suit in welcoming larger classes in the near-term.

ABA Report Calls for Action to Help Young Lawyers Struggling with Student Loans

A study released this week by the Young Lawyers Division of the American Bar Association (ABA) shows that student debt is impacting law graduates’ lives and mental health. The survey, which included responses from 1,084 law school graduates from the last ten years, found that not only are almost all law school graduates impacted by student loan debt, but that it affects them personally and professionally. The study also found that lawyers of color were disproportionately impacted.

Just over 95 percent of survey respondents took out student loans for law school and more than 90 percent of respondents graduated from law school with at least $65,000 in student debt. The mean loan balance post-JD was $164,742, which includes undergraduate loan balances averaging $17,512. Notably, while about a quarter of white respondents hold over $200,000 in debt at graduation, this proportion increases to at least one third among Asian, Black, Hispanic, and Multiracial respondents.

For many, these loans also grow over time, with the reported current mean loan balance ($171,036) slightly higher than the mean at graduation. Most respondents reported that their loans were higher or the same as they were at graduation; 40.4 percent of respondents reported higher and 11.7 percent said the same. Among Black respondents, however, a staggering 67 percent reported higher debt now than at graduation. Even among the more tenured lawyers, those who graduated before 2014, 45.4 percent have higher levels of student debt currently than at graduation. Though the report acknowledges that there may be reasons explaining the increased debt, including strategic repayment plans, loan forgiveness plans, and/or unemployment, it illustrates the structural burden of such high debt.

Almost all respondents, 89.8 percent, reported making at least one personal decision based on debt. Over half of those surveyed postponed or opted not to take a vacation (58.3 percent) or postponed or decided not to buy a house (55.6 percent). More significantly, almost half of respondents, 48 percent, postponed or decided not to have children due to their debt, while about 28.8 percent postponed or decided not to get married.

Professionally, 37 percent chose a job that paid more money over a job that they really wanted, and 33.5 percent took a different career than originally expected. Among those lawyers working as corporate counsel or in private practice, over 40 percent (43.2 and 42.1 respectively) said that they took a job that pays more instead of a job that they really wanted. Similarly, large proportions of those working in government/military and public sector/non-profit (63.8 percent and 50.9 percent respectively) chose a job that qualified them for loan forgiveness over a job that they really wanted. 

Perhaps most importantly, the report calls out the emergence of mental health as a theme in the responses of survey participants, despite participants not being prompted to discuss their mental health. The survey included an open-ended question that asked how student debt has impacted respondents’ lives, and the responses consistently mentioned stress, anxiety, mental wellness, depression, and anger. The report summary noted that the responses were “jarring” in both content as well as the frequency in which mental health and related issues were mentioned.

The ABA calls the report “a call to action” and urges a new approach to student loan advocacy, stating that if changes are not made soon, entering the profession could become cost prohibitive.

Medical Schools Called to Increase Diversity as Pandemic Highlights Racial Disparities in Healthcare

Glaring disparities in health outcomes by race, of those individuals diagnosed with COVID-19, have prompted providers and administrators to look at how structural racism has taken root within health education, training, and practice.

Late last month, The Atlantic published an article, Five Ways the Health-Care System Can Stop Amplifying Racism. While the article describes a complex system, including the inner-workings of hospitals, government, and insurance companies, it directly advocates for medical schools, and other provider training programs, to increase diversity in their student bodies and create a curriculum that addresses existing bias and racism, common in medical practice.

Medical schools have long sought to increase diversity, as diversity in providers means significant improvement in patient outcomes—A study out of Oakland, CA showed black doctors’ involvement with black patients increased preventive care and reduced the cardiovascular mortality gap between black and white men by 19 percent. Another study of black newborns in Florida showed that the newborns treated by black physicians had a mortality rate that was half that of babies cared for by non-black physicians.

But the number of minorities in medical school has remained low. A congressional report released last month by Democrats on the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, reported that as of 2019, only 5.8 percent of physicians identified as Hispanic, 5 percent as Black or African American, 0.3 percent as American Indian or Alaskan Native, and 0.1 percent as Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. Further, among 2019 medical school graduates, 5.3 percent were Hispanic or Latino, 6.2 percent were Black, 0.2 percent were American Indian or Alaskan Native, and 0.1 percent were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.

Why? Perhaps it is because there are barriers to medical education: substantial costs, the time and attention required to prep for and take the MCAT, apply to medical schools, travel to interviews, as well as a hostile learning environment. A report released early this year found that underrepresented minorities, including Hispanic, Black, and Native American students, were more likely to experience bullying or harassment during medical training than white students at 38 percent and 24 percent respectively.

Providing medical students with a curriculum that exposes bias and the roots of structural racism is vital. The Atlantic article points out that, “To this day, medical textbooks still depict mostly white skin tones. Many medical students hold empirically false beliefs about race-based physiological differences—including the notion that black patients have a higher tolerance for pain than white patients. These beliefs affect the kind of decisions that doctors make.” 

While people can change over time, schools must proactively work to diminish racism in future doctors. This summer, a team of professors at Yale Medical School published an article in the Journal of General Internal Medicine that proposed schools seek to filter out racist applicants and withhold admittance. While acknowledging the difficulty of evaluating racist attitudes, the professors suggest using additional essays, interview scenarios, and evaluative questionnaires to adequately provide admissions teams insight into where an applicant falls on a “continuum of racial attitudes.”

MBA Programs Seek to Increase Flexibility in Admissions Process

Earlier this month, Georgia Tech’s Scheller College of Business and the University of Maryland’s Smith School of Business announced that their full-time MBA programs would go test-optional for the 2020-2021 admission cycle. These two are the latest among a growing group of schools to waive standardized test requirements for eligible applicants. Like Northeastern University’s D’Amore-McKim School of Business, Georgia Tech’s Scheller plans to pilot the test-optional policy for all Fall 2021 applicants. The University of Maryland’s Smith School of Business is implementing a test waiver program where applicants who meet an existing set of criteria can opt out of providing standardized test scores. UVA Darden, University of Wisconsin-Madison’s School of Business, and Rutgers Business School have incorporated similar criteria-based waiver systems.

The schools point out that while they have used standardized test scores previously, to gauge an applicant’s ability to compete in the academic rigor of their program, they say their admissions teams remain confident in their holistic assessment of an applicant’s potential. UVA Darden is asking candidates who do not provide test scores to include alternative evidence that they will be able to succeed academically.

The schools hope that the policy will attract more applicants. After announcing its test-optional policy, UVA Darden reported receiving “an influx of qualified applicants who had been furloughed or laid off amid the pandemic.” Speaking to the Wall Street Journal, Blair Sanford, Assistant Dean for Full-Time MBA and Master’s Programs at Wisconsin-Madison said, “Some of the reasons why we decided to expand the policy in the first place still exist. The pandemic is still in place… In addition, it gives us a broader reach to attract qualified students in a difficult environment.”

The schools are also optimistic that the policy change will appeal to a more diverse swath of applicants, particularly those from a range of socioeconomic backgrounds. The costs of taking the standardized tests, including preparation, can be a barrier to otherwise well-qualified applicants. Maryam Alavi, Dean at Georgia Tech’s Scheller College of Business, in an interview with Poets & Quants said, “Beyond the complications COVID-19 has introduced in terms of access to exams, an overreliance on standardized test scores in MBA admissions decisions puts underrepresented minorities, individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, and first-generation college graduates at a disadvantage. We move forward confident that the change in this year’s admission process will attract our most diverse, qualified, and successful MBA cohort yet.”

According to the Wall Street Journal, however, many of the elite schools remain hesitant to move completely away from standardized testing, though most have begun accepting the results from online GRE and GMAT testing. And a few top-tier schools including NYU’s Stern, Columbia University’s Business School, and most recently, Vanderbilt University’s Owen, have opted to accept the Executive Assessment (EA) test as an alternative to the GMAT/GRE for full-time MBA applicants. The EA, which is much shorter at 40 questions and 90 minutes compared to the four-hour GRE or GMAT, generally requires less intensive preparation than its longer counterparts.

It will be interesting to see how things evolve from here, even among elite schools. Michael Robinson, Associate Director of MBA Admissions at Columbia Business School, has expressed interest in following the methods and outcomes of elite undergraduate institutions that have gone test-optional. At an MBA roundtable over the summer, Robinson said, “So, for us in admissions, it’s not that we want to basically admit people with the highest test average. It’s more about whether this person can succeed academically in that class. There are ways to get the right answer to that question without a GRE or GMAT or executive assessment. So I’m really curious to see what’s happening there. We’ll see what that looks like.”

Medical School Enrollment Growth Limited by Space Constraints in Clinical Training and Residency Programs

Last month, MedPage Today reported that applications to medical school have risen significantly compared to the same period last year, according to both the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) and the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM). AAMC reported a year-over-year increase of 14 percent in early August, and AACOM reported an uptick of 17.7 percent as of mid-August.

Sources speaking to MedPage Today pointed to the pandemic as a reason for the spike, suggesting that the current high-profile nature of medical personnel may be inspiring applications to medical school. Other applicants may be taking advantage of idle time to submit their applications early, while some may be seeking alternative paths to mitigate economic uncertainty. Geoffrey Young, AAMC’s Senior Director of Student Affairs and Programs, told MedPage that the early indicators may not necessarily indicate a more competitive year, noting that the pandemic has created “an unconventional time.”

While both AAMC and AACOM schools are expanding their capacity where possible, both note that their growth is limited due to a lack of corresponding residency spots. The AAMC has launched a few new schools, which has increased overall enrollment, and remains optimistic that many schools will be able to make incremental increases in class size. Larger updates to class sizes, however, would have to be approved by the accrediting agency. Osteopathic school enrollments are growing faster, with a 6.6 percent increase approved for the upcoming year by the accrediting agency, up from a 5.6 percent increase the year before.

This capacity constraint suggests that many qualified candidates may not find a place in medical school, despite a national need to grow the physician workforce. Results released last week from the AAMC Annual Survey also focus on the significance of the clinical experience constraint. In the survey, which was administered in November 2019 to 154 medical schools, school leaders voiced apprehension about the number of residency positions and clinical training sites available to students.

Just under half of the schools reported “major or moderate” concern about their students finding post-graduate residency positions of their choice. While medical school enrollment has seen significant growth over the last two decades, an increase of 33 percent since 2002, residency availability has grown much more slowly. Federal support for Graduate Medical Education (GME) provided through Medicaid, has been capped for the last two decades, effectively leaving funding for GME at teaching hospitals at 1996 levels. The National Resident Matching Program reports that this year 40,084 MD and DO graduates applied for only 37,256 residency positions though the Main Residency Match.

In addition to concerns about residency, a large majority of medical school leaders reported concern over the availability of clinical training sites for students. As demand increases for clinical experiences from other medical trainees, including nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and DO programs, AAMC medical schools are feeling more stretched to meet their students’ needs. Most of the survey respondents reported concern about clinical training sites and qualified primary care preceptors, 84 and 86 percent respectively, and just under three-fourths, 71 percent, mentioned concern about students having access to qualified specialty preceptors.

MBA Programs Turn to Virtual Learning this Semester

Stanford’s Graduate School of Business recently announced that it would start the autumn quarter online, as Santa Clara County is on California’s COVID watch list. School administrators say they will revisit their decision the week of September 21st. If the county is off the watch list for three consecutive days, indoor classes will be considered.

The announcement is the latest from an elite MBA program planning on a wholly virtual curriculum, rather than a hybrid model. Earlier in the month, University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School and Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business also announced that they would start the semester with all-virtual coursework.

MBA programs have been under scrutiny as administrators work through pandemic-related restrictions. With some MBA price tags as high as $200,000, including living expenses, many students are questioning if the virtual experience, without the in-person networking opportunities, is worth the price.

Prior to this month’s announcement, a group of Wharton MBA students petitioned the school for a discount due to their diminished experience.  The group’s petition, signed by 532 second-year students or just under 70 percent of the class, included results from a survey of second-year Wharton students. The survey responses from 572 students showed frustration and disappointment in the school’s response to the pandemic and a desire for more communication and collaboration in decision-making processes. Over three-fourths of respondents, 78 percent, were “not excited for the upcoming semester,” and 94 percent said that they felt the value of their MBA experience had been diminished by at least 40 percent. Just 14 percent of respondents felt that the school had incorporated student feedback into its decision-making process for the Fall 2020 semester. The school has responded that it will not discount the tuition this year.

Similarly, 270 MBA students at NYU’s Stern School of Business sent a letter to the administration, asking the school to decrease tuition rather than move forward with a planned 3.5 percent tuition increase. A Stern spokeswoman responded that the tuition will not be amended, but that it has increased MBA scholarships this year and is working to maximize its student experience. The school plans to provide a hybrid learning model.

Even Harvard Business School is feeling the effects. The school, which plans to provide students with a blended model including small-group work and in-person course elements as well as virtual learning, announced this summer that its matriculating class will be about 20 percent smaller than typical due to the number of accepted students who chose to defer their start date.

Rather than Grant Diploma Privilege, New York State Opts to Provide Remote Bar Exam

Late last week, the New York Court of Appeals announced that it would be offering an online bar exam in October, as a one-time, emergency option in lieu of an in-person exam. Earlier this month, the state cancelled the September in-person test due to coronavirus-related safety concerns, without communicating an alternative. Since then, law grads, state lawmakers, and all 15 NY law school deans have increasingly pressured the state to grant “diploma privilege,” which provides law school graduates licensure without having to sit for the bar exam. The proponents behind the push, which is also occurring in jurisdictions throughout the nation, argue that while an in-person test constitutes a health risk, delays in examinations and licensure can put financial pressure on graduates with student loans. At this point, just four states – Louisiana, Washington, Oregon, and Utah – have decided to grant diploma privilege.

The New York Court of Appeals established a court-appointed working group to consider the various licensure alternatives, including diploma privilege. The group, however, found the remote exam to provide the best alternative to the in-person exam, noting the role that exam-based licensure plays in promoting consumer confidence. In its announcement, the court made the point that the bar exam “provides critical assurance to the public that admitted attorneys meet minimum competency requirements, emphasizing New York’s immense candidate pool as well as the degree of variation in legal curricula across the country.” The working group did remark that the online test was the best option, but not without its shortcomings. To minimize those, the working group consulted with experts in security, technology, and psychometrics to “ensure broad access, mitigate security risks, and establish a reliable grading methodology.”

New York is among a growing number of jurisdictions, including California, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Connecticut, Maryland, Washington D.C., Vermont, New Hampshire, Kentucky, Texas, Arizona, Oregon, and Tennessee that have opted to provide the October online bar exam. The working group further recommended that New York look into offering reciprocity to other states and jurisdictions offering the online option, which would mean that the bar exam scores could be transferred to other jurisdictions for bar admittance. Six localities, New Jersey, Maryland, Massachusetts, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Washington D.C. have established reciprocity and New Hampshire, Vermont, Ohio, and Illinois have also expressed interest in pursuing reciprocity agreements.

Business Schools Speak Out in Defense of International Students

Early last week, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency announced updated guidelines for the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), which will impact foreign-born students studying in the U.S. The updates include the following:

• Foreign students on F-1 visas who take full online course loads will not be permitted to maintain residency in the U.S.

• Students may take a hybrid course load with both in-person and online offerings. The student’s school must certify that he/she is not taking an entirely online course load.

• Students whose course loads change throughout the semester will still be subject to the rule. If a student changes her course selections or is required to switch to online-only at any point in the semester, she must notify the agency within ten days.

• Students whose schools are online-only should consider transferring to a school offering in-person instruction to lawfully remain in the country.

• Students who remain in the U.S. while taking an online-only course load may face “immigration consequences.”

The guidance, which was updated in response to the COVID-19 pandemic for the spring and summer 2020 semesters, to allow for online study, is a reversion back to the previous ruling that SEVP does not allow for a student to take an online course load and maintain U.S. residency. However, given the uncontrolled nature of the pandemic throughout much of the country, schools and students have expressed shock at the update, particularly as many universities are still seeking the safest means to proceed with classes in the fall and must now contend with decreased flexibility. The universities that have publicly responded to the guidelines have been clear in their intentions to support their international students.

• NYU announced that its fall plans would include a hybrid model with an emphasis on accommodating international students. Stanford, which had planned to provide most courses online, also pledged to support its students in finishing their degrees. Columbia University communicated its intentions to “alleviate the negative effect of these new regulations,” as well a plan to provide pop-up centers for students unable to return to campus.

• Princeton, MIT, Duke, California Institute of Technology, and Dartmouth told Forbes that they are reviewing the policy’s implications and noted the importance of international students to their communities.

• MIT and Harvard have filed a lawsuit against the administration stating that the option to offer remote courses during the pandemic is “of paramount importance to universities across the country.” Northeastern University has also joined the suit and Cornell is supporting it via amicus brief.

• The California State Attorney General has also announced a lawsuit against the new policy.

The updated guidelines are thought to be part of the Trump Administration’s push for schools to re-open for in-person instruction in the fall, as well as part of continued efforts to restrict immigration. Last month, the President suspended the H-1B visa program for the remainder of 2020 via executive order. While the order kept the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program in operation, which allows international students to work in the country for one to three years, the H-1B visa is often seen as the goal for OPT participants.  As such, the executive order disappointed business schools as it may serve to discourage international students from studying in the U.S. by making it harder to find long-term employment post-graduation. Last October, the Graduate Management Admissions Council (GMAC) supported by a group of 50 business school deans, published and signed a white paper calling for an increase in H-1B visas to encourage the flow of international talent into the country.

There is a sense among U.S. business schools that the administration’s restrictions on immigration and work visas will only further harm their ability to compete internationally. According to GMAC, almost half (48 percent) of MBA programs saw a decline in applications from international students for their 2019 entering classes.

Women of Color Report Lower Satisfaction with Law School

Amidst ongoing Black Lives Matter protests in the U.S., a recently released report seeks to understand the experiences of women of color in law school. And it finds that minority women are significantly less likely than white women to be satisfied with their law school experience, at 82 and 89 percent, respectively. Just 30 percent of minority women and 33 percent of minority men report that they are “extremely satisfied” with their experience compared to 39 percent of white women and 44 percent of white men.

The report, titled Women of Color – a Study of Law School Experiences, was released by the Center for Women in Law and the NALP Foundation, and was conceived in response to the underrepresentation and departure of women of color in legal organizations, especially law firms. The sponsoring organizations wanted to explore the possibility that early barriers and imbalances in opportunity for women of color created disadvantages that impacted their careers over time. The study leading up to the report looked at disparities in the law school experience, social and academic, between women of color, white women, white men, and men of color. The survey period ran from 2017 to 2018 and included over 4,000 students from 46 law schools; 773 were women of color which included Asian/Pacific Islander, Black/African-American, and Hispanic/Latina.

Key findings:

• About one-third of women of color said that they have seriously considered leaving law school (31 percent), while about a quarter of white women, white men, and men of color said the same (24 percent, 22 percent, and 26 percent respectively). Among the minority women who said they considered leaving, most cited “do not enjoy law school” (45 percent), “financial debt” (38 percent), and “not a good fit socially” (35 percent) as the primary reasons.

• When asked to assess race relations, just 40 percent of women of color rated their law school positively compared to 70 percent of white men, 59 percent of men of color, and 58 percent of white women. Among the women of color, Hispanic/Latina’s ratings were the most positive and 25 percentage points higher than Black/African American women, and 13 percentage points higher than Asian/Pacific Islanders.

• Fifty-two percent of minority women reported they experienced comments or interactions by students and/or faculty that negatively impacted their academic performance, compared to just 21 percent of white men, 34 percent of minority men, and 41 percent of white women. Women of color were also less likely than white women to say that they frequently felt comfortable raising their hand in class to ask questions.

• At 71 percent, women of color were the least likely cohort to report having discussions with professors about their career plans and future goals, which was six percentage points below white women who were the most likely to engage in such discussions. However, 85 percent of women of color reported meeting one-one-one with professors to discuss coursework or grades.

• Similar numbers of students across demographics said that they expected to practice law after graduation: women of color (90 percent), white men (89 percent), white women (88 percent), and men of color (87 percent).

NALP Foundation President Fiona Trevelyan Hornblower, via Bloomberg law, said that law schools, “can use this data to intervene and develop strategies to support students, to advance their success, both in law school and beyond.”

Meet Your B-School Match this July!

The MBA Tour connects you with business schools from around the world, such as Wharton, IESE, Columbia & Chicago Booth. Their intelligent matching algorithm distills decades of experience to recommend the best schools for you. They’ll make the introductions, give you access to exclusive panels and discussions, and help you network with admissions professionals, alumni and fellow candidates.

Join in the virtually in the city closest to your home:

Seattle: July 7 - 5:00pm – 8:30pm
San Francisco: July 9 – 5:00pm – 8:30pm 
Los Angeles: July 11 – 11:00am – 2:30pm
Houston: July 14 – 5:00pm – 8:30pm
Chicago: July 16 – 5:00pm – 8:30pm
New York City: July 18 – 11:00am – 3:00pm 
Boston: July 20 – 5:00pm – 8:30pm
Atlanta: July 21 – 5:00pm – 8:30pm 
Washington DC: July 22 – 5:00pm – 8:30pm

Here is what you'll gain by attending The MBA Tour's virtual event this month:

1. Network with admissions decision makers from top business schools such as Wharton, Columbia, Chicago Booth and IESE.
2. Be matched with high-potential schools by our smart algorithm.
3. Explore the unique features of various business programs during interactive presentations.
4. Get exclusive GMAT tips from the exam creators.
5. Learn from industry specialists during 25-minute advising sessions.

Early MCAT Registration Numbers Show Significant Interest in Medical School

The AAMC announced a positive outlook for future medical school classes. When the MCAT registration opened in early May, after having been closed in March and April due to stay-at-home orders, 62,000 people registered online. This is a significant increase from the typical 10,000 to 12,000 on the opening day of registration. Similarly, registration for the American Medical College Application Service in early March showed an increase of 50 percent (in the number of applications started in the same period last year) in the first three days. While not all these prospective students will submit applications, it does provide reason for optimism about the future.

President and CEO of the AAMC, David Skorton, MD, said, "We're very encouraged by students' strong interest in registering for the MCAT exam. We're starting to see hints of strong interest in people entering the field overall, even though it's quite early in the medical school application process. It is a great sign if this preliminary trend continues, because our country needs more doctors."