STEM-Designated MBA Programs are on the Rise

In March, Fordham University’s Gabelli School of Business announced that its full-time MBA received STEM designation for all students entering in Fall 2022 and beyond. The announcement is the latest in a trend of full-time MBA programs securing or pursuing STEM designation, according to a Kaplan/Manhattan Prep business school admissions officer survey published earlier this year. Among 91 full-time MBA programs surveyed, 22 percent of admissions officers said that their programs currently hold STEM designation, a sharp uptick from 13 percent in 2020.  An additional 23 percent said that their programs are pursuing the designation. The remaining 55 percent said that they are not currently pursuing, and have no plans to pursue STEM designation. 

STEM designation is particularly relevant for MBA programs hoping to attract international/non-citizen students who plan to pursue post-graduate careers in the United States. Graduates of STEM designated programs receive an additional 24 months to work in the country, without an H-1B visa, as well as the customary 12 months after graduation. For domestic and international students alike, the demand for STEM-trained graduates is projected to increase over the next five years. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects demand for STEM jobs will grow 13 percent by 2027. Additionally, average wages in STEM are higher than those in non-STEM fields. 

Brian Carlidge, Kaplan’s Vice President, explained the uptick in the designation among some programs, as well as others’ hesitation. “Earning a STEM designation is a trend that is catching on quickly, especially among the top ranked MBA programs. For less competitive programs, adoption has been steady, but a lot slower. While the process for business schools to secure STEM designation is not a quick or easy one, and perhaps many smaller programs don’t have the bandwidth to do so, not being STEM-designated may put them at a distinct recruitment disadvantage. For many applicants outside the United States, it will be the differentiator,” he said.

Current STEM Offerings in the Top 15 MBA Programs (2023 U.S. News & World Report):

1- University of Chicago (Booth): Full-time (FT) MBA

1- University of Pennsylvania (Wharton): Six majors in FT MBA: Business Analytics; Business Economics & Public Policy; Business, Energy, Environment & Sustainability; Operations, Information & Decisions; Quantitative Finance; Statistics

3- Northwestern University (Kellogg): FT and Evening/Weekend MBA programs, MBAi, MMM

3- Stanford University: FT MBA and MSX 

5- Harvard University: FT MBA Management Science track

5- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Sloan): FT MBA

7- Yale University: FT MBA Management Science track, MAM Management Science track, Master’s degree in Asset Management

8- Columbia University: FT MBA

8- University of California Berkeley (Haas): FT and Evening/Weekend MBA programs

10- University of Michigan (Ross): FT MBA Specialization in Management Science

11- Dartmouth University (Tuck): FT MBA Management Science and Quantitative Methods track

12- Duke University (Fuqua): FT MBA Management Science and Technology Management (MSTeM) track

12- New York University (Stern): FT MBA (two-year), Andre Koo Technology and Entrepreneurship MBA

14- University of Virginia (Darden): FT MBA Management Science track

15- Cornell University (Johnson): Management Science MBA (one and two-year), Tech MBA, MPS in Management, MPS in Management-Accounting Specialization

Related blog: Trends in Business: MBA Programs Prepare Students for Leadership Roles in Technology

Virtual Interviews Continue for Law Students Applying to Summer Associate Positions

Law360 just released its annual Summer Associates Survey. This year’s survey, with responses from over 1,000 current law students (predominantly in their first and second years), examines the process by which students match with summer associate positions at law firms, specifically the interviewing process, firm selection criteria by students, and the impact of COVID-19 on summer internships.

Interviews 

On average, students reported applying to 17 firms for summer associate positions (with a median of ten). Through on-campus interview bids, students received an average of 5 interviews during early interview week (with a median of two). Overall, the average success rate of obtaining an interview was 34 percent, although 30 percent of applicants did not receive any interviews during early interview week. 

Five law schools (of the 29 with data published) had success rates of students garnering interviews of over 50 percent. They were Harvard (66 percent), Columbia (61 percent), NYU (5800 percent), UCLA (54 percent), and UC Berkeley (53 percent). NYU students, on average, received the highest number of interviews per student at 15.7, followed by Columbia (14.0), UCLA (12.6), and Harvard (12.4). 

The majority of respondents reported that all of their summer associateship interviews were remote, although at 69 percent, the number has decreased significantly from 82 percent last year.

Student Selection Criteria

Among the criteria for selecting a firm for a summer associateship, students ranked “practice areas available” as the most important (54 percent), followed by geography (51 percent), firm reputation (39 percent), and culture advertised (36 percent). Just about one-third (34 percent) viewed the option to report virtually to the associateship, with no need to physically relocate, as important or very important. 

Student Support

Students were most likely to rely significantly on their law school’s career services office (26 percent) to navigate the law firm selection process. However, they also said they rely on alumni working in firms as associates (20 percent) and friends working at firms (19 percent) as key resources.

While about two-thirds of respondents (61 percent) said that their law school prepared them for on-campus interviewing with mock summer associate interviews, the remainder said they did not (39 percent). 

Covid-19 Impacts

While the effects of the pandemic are still present for some 2022 summer associates, the impact is decreasing in scale. Almost all students, 92 percent, said that, if given the option, they would report to the office for their 2022 summer internship. 

When asked how the covid-19 pandemic has affected their summer associateship programs:

• One-third of respondents reported that they believe covid-19 has hindered their ability to network with attorneys at potential internship firms in a moderate to significant way, which is a sharp decline from 58 percent last year. 

• About a quarter of respondents, 24 percent, said they will be working in a hybrid role this summer (part virtual, part in-person), and 9 percent will work fully remote. 

• 37 percent said that during their interview process, they encountered a firm that would allow them to report virtually to the internship while living in a different city, whereas the remaining 63 percent did not receive such an offer. 

Student Concerns

Students’ biggest concerns going into their summer associate positions are an inability to connect with colleagues/mentors due to remote work (25 percent), not being up to the workload (25 percent), and not getting hired at the conclusion of the summer position (24 percent). 

Find the full report here. 

The Medical School Admissions Process is Long and Stressful. How are you Coping?

Earlier this month, Dr. Anne Thorndike, a physician in internal medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital and an associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, wrote that physician burnout starts with the medical school admissions process, which takes almost twice the length of time as other graduate admissions processes. In an opinion piece for STAT, an online health, medicine, and scientific discovery publication, she called for a shortened admissions timeline for medical school applicants and says the current process is time-consuming, expensive, highly-competitive, and intensely stressful. 

Referencing a plethora of studies, she goes on to describe the stress that medical school applicants face prior to even beginning their professional journey. A 2012 study showed higher emotional exhaustion, a symptom of burnout, in pre-medical students compared to non-premedical students. In another study, 33 Black and Hispanic medical students interviewed from across the country described medical school admissions as “very negative” because it was overwhelming and required an “extensive investment of time.” A 2020 online survey found that 73 percent of 556 medical school applicants had depression or anxiety symptoms, with half reporting uncertainty related to the application timeline.

So, how can you manage effectively this daunting process as an applicant? We encourage you to explore and refine various coping mechanisms—exercise, mindfulness, talk therapy, and/or outside adventure activities—that work for you. Taking this step will be just as critical to any application prep course you will take. And you will certainly carry with you these practices into your future career in medicine. 

A recent article in the Washington Post covers the physical effects of stress and the practices that may mitigate its impact. Ahmed Tawakol, Director of Nuclear Cardiology at the Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, recommends regular exercise, and high-quality sleep which “...can reduce stress activity in the brain, systemic inflammation, and your risk of developing cardiovascular disease.” Others interviewed point to the power of deep-breathing exercises, muscle relaxation techniques, meditation, and/or yoga, which can actually decrease your body’s reactivity to stress.

As you prepare for medical school, consider carefully how your habits may help or hinder you. Then you can work to integrate stress-reducing practices and positive choices into your daily life.  

Related Blogs:

Medical Students Offer Recommendations to Improve Medical Schools’ Ability to Promote Student Wellbeing

Pre-Med Students Face Stress as Clinical Experiences Become Harder to Find

Narrative Medicine Helps Physicians Gain Empathy, Make Connections, and Accept Difficult Experiences

When to Use the AMCAS Disadvantaged Applicant Status

Applicants to medical school may apply as a disadvantaged candidate through the AMCAS portal. If they opt in, they are allotted 1,325 characters to respond to an additional essay prompt: "Do you wish to be considered a disadvantaged applicant by any of your designated medical schools that may consider such factors (social, economic or educational)?" 

When determining if this designation is appropriate you will want to consider the following: 

• Does my disadvantage fall into one of these categories: economic, social, or educational? For example, did you attend an underfunded/underperforming high school that left you struggling to adjust to college (with associated impacts on your GPA)? Or were your individual or family assets below specified thresholds, which qualified you for state or federal assistance programs?  

• Did my disadvantage change my application to medical school in a way that necessitates additional context for the admissions committee? For example, did you grow up in a rural area that is medically underserved, which impacted your ability to obtain clinical experiences? 

If you feel that you’ve experienced a situation that merits the disadvantaged designation, use this essay to provide the admissions committee necessary context as they review your application. We recommend that you spend about 20 percent of your writing on the situation itself, using fact-based (rather than emotional) language. You want to clearly convey the reality of the situation and the direct impacts of your experience on your medical school application. The remaining 80 percent of your essay should focus on the actions that you’ve taken to combat the adversity you’ve faced, and what you’ve learned from it. And be sure to explain how your learnings will impact you as a medical student and physician. Are you more resourceful, hardworking, empathic, and adaptable as a result? 

How to Approach the Harvard Business School Essay

Last week, the Harvard Business School posted the submission deadlines for applicants to the MBA Class of 2025, and confirmed the required essay. The essay prompt, consistent with last year, asks: “As we review your application, what more would you like us to know as we consider your candidacy for the Harvard Business School MBA program?” Although the application does not open until June, it’s never too early to start planning your narrative response. 

At HBS, as with other elite programs, the essay is a critical component of your application. Not only does it allow you to differentiate yourself among a large pool of highly-qualified applicants, but it provides an opportunity to show the character traits that Harvard values. HBS puts a strong emphasis on character and service, with a longstanding mission “to educate leaders who make a difference in the world.” The program also expressly calls out community values including, “trust and mutual respect, free expression and inquiry, and a commitment to truth, excellence, and lifelong learning.” Dean Srikant Datar describes one of his aspirations for the school as “...stretching HBS and its learners beyond notions of merely personal success toward becoming, collectively and individually, driving forces in redefining the role of business in society around the world—addressing inequality, exclusion, climate change, and other intractable problems.” 

Begin with a Brainstorm. Do not underestimate the importance of this step. Document your experiences, positive and negative, that prompted an evolution in your perspective—you know, those “ah-ha!” moments without which you would be a different student, professional, and/or person today. Then, record those experiences that will show the reader your abilities in innovation (critical/creative thinking and problem solving), leadership, and teamwork, as well as those experiences that reinforced your interest in an MBA program. Capture as many details as possible, paying particular attention to what you thought, felt, said, and did in each situation. Your focus should be on adult experiences (from the start of college and later), though stories from your youth could comprise up to 20 percent of this brainstorm.

During your brainstorm, don’t limit yourself by worrying about a cohesive narrative, the quality of your writing, or the number/length of your stories. Simply focus on collecting those situations that helped to guide your path to this point and impacted your decision to apply to the Harvard MBA program.

Once you have these thoughts on paper, look again at all of your experiences. Start to think about the story you want to tell, and also how you can use your experiences to best position yourself with the admissions committee. 

The Outline. As you start to consider how you will anchor and organize your essay, you’ll want to think about your application as a whole—MBA Admissions committees are looking for you to demonstrate MBA-readiness with high potential in the areas of innovation, leadership, and teamwork—so you can use your essay strategically to show those qualities that may not be covered in your other materials. For example, if you have a perfect score on the analytical section of your GMAT and fantastic work experience in an analytical career on your resume, you may wish to use your essay to take the reader on a deep dive into your most meaningful leadership and/or community engagement experience. 

Create a draft. Now, it is time to start writing. While there is no limitation on length, we recommend that you target about 1300 to 1500 words. Keep in mind that you must be showing, not telling the reader who you are. Invite the reader into your life by highlighting sensory details, such as smells and sounds, and don’t hesitate to engage your readers emotionally. Sprinkle in humor (if you feel comfortable doing so) or hit a poignant note. In contrast to your resume which provides a general overview of your experiences, your essay responses should go deep into a story that allows the reader to come to their own conclusions about some of your character traits and abilities. Highlight how you’ve struggled, triumphed, learned, and how these experiences have developed you into the person you are now.   

And don’t forget that the essay is part memoir, part strategic communication. Amidst your reflections, don’t neglect to make it clear why a Harvard MBA is your next step. The question is asking about you (rather than “Why Harvard?”), but you’ll want to write it so that the reader finishes with a clear understanding of why a Harvard MBA is the next logical step. 

Review. Revise. Repeat. Read your essay aloud noting where you stumble. Make revisions as necessary. Once it reads smoothly, set it down and walk away for at least 24 hours. Then re-read it. Is it you? Is it personal and authentic? You want the reader to see the real person behind the applicant number. While we caution against “oversharing,” being appropriately vulnerable will create connection.  

Related blogs:

• Harvard Business School Sets a New Agenda Focused on Positioning Business to Solve Society’s Biggest Challenges

• How to Approach Columbia’s Essays: Part I

• How to Approach Columbia’s Essays: Part II

• How to Approach Wharton’s Essays

• How to Approach the MIT Sloan Essays

• Your MBA Application. Acing the Video Essay

ABA to Vote on Recommendation that Would Allow Law Schools to Drop Admissions Test Requirement

Later this month, the American Bar Association will vote on a recommendation by its Strategic Review Committee to eliminate the requirement that all law schools must include standardized testing as a component of admissions. Should the recommendation be accepted, it would not take effect until next year (at the earliest) and would allow individual law schools the option to remove or retain current testing requirements. The current standard states that all law schools “shall require” applicants to submit scores from a “valid and reliable admission test,” which in November of 2021 was expanded to include the GRE, in addition to the LSAT. 

The revision language notes that, “While a law school may still choose to use one or more admissions tests as part of sound admission practices or policies, the revisions require a law school to identify all tests that it accepts in its admissions policies so that applicants to the law school know which admissions tests are accepted.” It goes on to describe that accepting the recommendation “eliminates some of the challenges inherent in determining which tests are in fact valid and reliable for law school admission,” although law schools that continue to use an admissions test would need to show that the test is in line with “sound admissions practices and procedures.” The Strategic Review Committee’s language also notes that, as of early 2022, the Council is the only remaining “accreditor among law, medical, dental, pharmacy, business, and architecture school accreditors that required an admissions test in its Standards.” This suggests that the change in language may not greatly impact the current practice of requesting test scores from applicants, particularly among highly-competitive programs. 

The Law School Admission Council (LSAC), which oversees the LSAT and is independent from the ABA, said in a statement, “Studies show test-optional policies often work against minoritized individuals, so we hope the ABA will consider these issues very carefully. We believe the LSAT will continue to be a vital tool for schools and applicants for years to come, as it is the most accurate predictor of law school success and a powerful tool for diversity when used properly as one factor in a holistic admission process.”

It will be necessary to follow news from the ABA over the next couple of weeks to see how the Council will proceed. Bill Adams, Managing Director of the ABA Accreditation and Legal Education, said in a statement that “Issues concerning admissions policies have been of concern to the Council for several years.” He went on to explain that the Council will discuss the recommendation on May 20, and determine if a vote is in order or if further circulation and comment will be required.

New Study Finds that Affirmative Action Bans Result in Fewer Students from Underrepresented Groups in Public Medical Schools

A study published last week in the peer-reviewed journal, Annals of Internal Medicine, found that affirmative action bans negatively impacted enrollment of underrepresented students in public medical schools. The study showed that in states which enacted bans, five years later, the proportion of underrepresented racial and ethnic minority students fell by more than one-third.

The study, which was led by Dan Ly, MD, and an assistant professor of medicine at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine, examined matriculants from 53 medical schools at public universities from 1985 through 2019. The researchers focused on students from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups including: Black, Hispanic, American Indian or Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander. Of the 53 medical schools, 32 were located within a state without an affirmative action ban and 21 were within a state with an affirmative action ban (Arizona, California, Florida, Michigan, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, and Washington). The bans were enacted between 1997 and 2013, and Texas’s ban was reversed in 2003. On average, in the year prior to a state implementing a ban, underrepresented students made up 14.8 percent of the public medical school enrollment. Five years after the states’ bans, underrepresented student enrollment had fallen by an average of 37 percent.

Dr. Ly describes the importance of the findings. "We know that a more diverse physician workforce leads to better care for racial- and ethnic-minority patients," he said. "Our research shows that bans on affirmative action, like the one California passed in 1996, have had a devastating impact on the diversity of our medical student body and physician pipeline." 

The authors note that the study did have limitations, which included the indirect effects of affirmative action on undergraduate admissions, the impact that public discussion of affirmative action may have had on medical school enrollment prior to the bans, and the possibility that some students may not have identified with the racial and ethnic groups defined by the study. Additionally, the study authors did not confirm if any schools in states without bans opted not to incorporate race or ethnicity in admissions decisions. However, the authors are optimistic that the study will provide policy-makers with a clearer understanding of the lag in diversifying medical student and physician populations, as well as informing them of the impact of affirmative action bans.  

A co-author of the study, Utibe Essien, MD, and an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh, notes that the findings are particularly poignant at this juncture. "As our country has spent the last two years weaving through the twin pandemics of racial health disparities amplified by COVID-19 and structural racism at large, our findings are critically important," he said. "As we observed, affirmative action bans have resulted in a loss of underrepresented physicians, who could have been at the front lines of caring for vulnerable populations throughout the pandemic and helping to alleviate disparities in care.”

Related Blog: Medical Schools Limited on Use of Race in Admissions Decisions but Still Seek to Promote Diversity

MBA Programs Increasing Use of Virtual and Tech-Enabled Recruiting Processes

The MBA Career Services and Employer Alliance (CSEA) recently shared the results of its 2021 Fall Recruiting Trends Survey. The findings show that recruiting is bouncing back to pre-pandemic levels for full-time MBA students, particularly within the consulting, technology, healthcare, and financial services industries. But certain pandemic trends may be here to stay. The findings highlight the continued relevance of virtual engagement opportunities between students, career services, and employee recruiters. 

The survey includes responses from 77 CSEA member schools, who completed the survey in January of 2022. 

Among full-time MBA programs, just over two-thirds of schools (35 percent) report that on-campus recruiting opportunities for MBA students, which includes in-person or virtual interviews organized through the school, are up this academic year compared to last. Just 27 percent report that opportunities are down, a sharp decline from 47 percent in 2020. Similarly, the majority of schools (74 percent) report that off-campus recruiting and job postings have increased in 2021. 

Most schools report increases in recruiting activities for full-time post-MBA employment within the consulting (84 percent), technology (82 percent), and healthcare (69 percent) industries. Schools continued to see decreased recruiting activity within the hospitality sector (33 percent), although the number of schools that experienced these decreases was smaller in 2021 than in 2020 (61 percent). Most schools’ recruiting activity, 76 percent, increased among large firms (more than 500 employees), and 63 percent saw increases in recruiting by mid-size firms (100-500 employees). The survey results note that, in previous years, schools were most likely to indicate recruiting increases by firms not headquartered within the school’s geographic region, which in 2021 was the third-largest increase (63 percent). 

In the survey, schools were also asked how student engagement with various career support activities compared to the prior year. The biggest increases were with one-on-one coaching appointments (50 percent of schools), virtual career fair participation (48 percent), and group coaching sessions (47 percent). Conversely, student engagement decreased the most among in-person career fair participation (58 percent of schools), on-campus interviewing (49 percent), and information session attendance (42 percent). 

Fall 2021 also brought changes in students’ interactions with recruiting activities. Most schools report that employers’ use of virtual interview technologies increased (90 percent), as did the use of AI-powered pre-interview screening tools (75 percent). A large number of schools, 68 percent, indicate an increasing use of virtual multi-school events. Schools also note growth in alumni-initiated hiring (62 percent), and virtual career fairs (61 percent). Conversely, almost two-thirds of schools report a decrease in student engagement with in-person career fairs (64 percent). 

Similar to the full-time employment recruiting trends, both off and on-campus opportunities for internship recruiting were more positive in 2021 than in 2020. Almost two-thirds of schools, 65 percent, report an increase in off-campus internship opportunities for full-time MBAs. And, over one-third, 36 percent, report that on-campus activities have increased, which compares favorably to the 16 percent of schools that reported increases in 2020. Again, similar to the full-time recruiting trends, most increases in internship recruiting were within the consulting (73 percent of schools) and technology (71 percent) industries. Financial services (60 percent) came in third. 

A large proportion of summer internships in 2021 remained in a virtual format. More than half of schools (56 percent) report that over 60 percent of their students’ 2021 summer internships were virtual, whereas in 2020, over 83 percent of schools reported predominantly virtual internships.   

Find the full survey results here, including data on full-time and internship recruiting for part-time MBA and specialized masters programs. 

AccessLex Institute Publishes Findings on Access, Affordability, and Value of Law School

The AccessLex Institute published its 2022 Legal Education Data Deck to showcase the latest trends in the access, affordability, and value of law school. AccessLex, a nonprofit institution with a mission to improve access to legal education and maximize its affordability and value, creates the data deck using publicly available datasets. We have provided key insights from the deck below. 

Applicant Volume

• Between 2017 and 2021 females made up the majority of applicants, and the proportion of male applicants declined each year during this period. Women accounted for 56 percent of applicants and men made up 42 percent in 2021. Correspondingly, women’s admissions rates were lower than men’s. In 2021, however, women’s admissions rate climbed to 70 percent (+2 percentage points from 2020), which was the first year-over-year increase in admissions rate for either men or women since 2014. 

• In 2017, female enrollment surpassed males. Since then, female enrollment has increased annually while male enrollment has declined. 

• In 2021, just under two-thirds of law degrees were awarded to white students (63 percent), while about a quarter went to students who identified as Hispanic/Latino (12 percent), Black/African-American (7 percent), and Asian (6 percent). 

Costs

• In 2021, there was a significant decrease in the average cost of full-time tuition and fees. Using 2021 dollars to compare costs across time, private school expenses decreased to a level not recorded since 2016, public school (resident) costs decreased to 2014 levels, and public school (non-resident) decreased to a level below 2013. 

• Between 2013 and 2020, there was a significant increase in the median grant amount awarded to full-time students. Using 2021 dollars to compare, the median grant amount increased from $15,800 in 2013 to $22,100 in 2020. 

• The share of full-time students receiving grant awards also increased between 2011 and 2019. In 2011, 13 percent of full-time students received a grant worth at least half of tuition, and in 2019, that number had more than doubled to 29 percent. Similarly, in 2011 52 percent of full-time students received a grant (worth any amount) and by 2019 over three-quarters (78 percent) received grant money. 

Value

• The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Occupational Outlooks projects growth in legal employment between 2019 and 2029. Among positions requiring a graduate or professional degree, lawyers are projected to have the third largest increase in openings (32,300). 

Access the full report here. 

Related blogs: Law School Hiring Rebounds to Pre-Pandemic Levels

New Physicians that Train in Surgery or Identify as a Sexual Minority are More Likely to Struggle with Mental Health During Intern Year

The trials of residency, particularly in the first year after completing medical school, are well documented. First year residents or interns work long and demanding hours in a high stress environment, and do so on little and irregular sleep. And two new studies out of the University of Michigan, which used data from the Michigan Neuroscience Institute’s Intern Health Study, show that two groups are at higher risk for developing negative mental health outcomes during this time: surgical trainees and those who identify as a sexual minority (lesbian, gay, bisexual, or other non-heterosexual).

The first study led by Tasha Hughes, MD, MPH, and an assistant professor in the University of Michigan Department of Surgery, explored changes in surgical residents’ mental health during the intern year, and also looked at how surgical residents’ experiences compare to those of other (non-surgical) residents. 

Hughes and her team found that, initially, surgical interns enter the program with lower rates of existing depression symptoms than a similar age cohort within the general population. However, after the intern year, almost one-third (32 percent) of interns screened positive for depression, based on their scores from at least one mood survey. 

Among the surgical interns, some demographic groups were more likely to develop depression—females, sexual minorities, singles (those with no partner), those working the most hours on average, and those with a history of negative childhood experiences. However, even after adjusting for these demographic factors, surgical interns were more likely than other interns to develop new-onset depression, except for when work hours were taken into account. Additionally, among those who screened positive for depression, 64 percent continued to report signs of depression on a later survey. 

Perhaps, equally worrisome, was that many of the surgical interns did not seek assistance. Just 26 percent of those whose scores were consistent with depression sought mental health care during their intern year. Hughes explains the importance of the findings for promoting a healthier learning environment. “Surgical training, especially in the United States, can be a period of intense stress, which we find is linked to new onset of depression,” said Hughes. “These findings suggest a need for surgical program directors, leaders, and health systems to continue to find ways to mitigate the effects of surgical training, normalize help-seeking, make mental health support easily available, and pay special attention to those with characteristics that might put them at increased risk.”

The second study, led by Tejal Patel, a student in her senior year at the University of Michigan, looked specifically at interns who started training in 2016 through 2018 and who identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or other non-heterosexual. 

At the commencement of the intern year, the sexual minority group’s depression scores were higher than those of the heterosexual group. However, rather than remaining consistent over time, the study found that the gap increased throughout the year with larger differences in mental health occurring in the second half of the year. “These results indicate that interns who are part of sexual minority groups may experience unique workplace stressors leading to a widening disparity in mental health,” said Patel. 

Post-Pandemic, Prospective MBA Students Express Greater Interest in Hybrid Learning and One-Year Full-Time MBA Programs

The Graduate Management Admissions Council (GMAC) recently released the 2022 results summary from its Prospective Students Survey. The survey, which was issued in 2021, garnered over 6,500 responses from prospective MBA students around the world. The resulting summary examines the shifting preferences of prospective students as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the delivery models of graduate management education. 

Below we provide a high-level summary of the findings. The full GMAC results summary is available here. 

While respondents do not feel that online and in-person formats provide the same value, there is growing interest in hybrid models. 

• Globally, respondents are still more likely to disagree that an online and an in-person graduate management degree offers the same level of opportunity in terms of networking (79 percent), value (73 percent), and career prospects (66 percent). But respondents are slightly less negative in 2021 than they were in 2020.   

• Globally, 20 percent of respondents in 2021 prefer a hybrid delivery model, an uptick from 14 percent in 2019. 

• Hybrid programs are particularly attractive to prospective students interested in an Executive MBA, Part-time MBA, or Flexible MBA, although interest in hybrid models increased significantly for all program types between 2019 and 2021.  

Consulting continues to top prospective students’ industry and job function preference lists, though interest in the technology industry continues to grow. 

• While both men and women express interest in consulting, men are more likely than women to select consulting as their industry (+8 percentage points) and job function (+9 percentage points) of choice. 

• Women are more likely than men to express interest in the marketing (+12 percentage points), media and communication (+9 percentage points), media/entertainment (+7 percentage points), and non-profit (+6 percentage points) industries.  

• Globally, interest in the technology industry increased three percentage points from 2019 to 39 percent in 2021. Among non-business undergraduate majors, technology is the most sought-after industry (49 percent). In 2021, a growing number of women expressed interest in technology compared to 2019 (+5 percentage points). 

• Prospective students most frequently list their post-degree career goals as: obtain a senior level position, get a raise/salary increase, obtain an executive level position, manage people, manage projects, and work for a company where they can travel internationally. 

• “Become the CEO of a company” provides a notable gender disparity within career goals. Globally, 31 percent of males list this as a career goal, while just 24 percent of females do. In general, U.S.-based respondents are less likely to name this as a goal (21 percent). 

• In 2021, the number of prospective students interested in changing industries or job functions (32 percent) returned to pre-pandemic levels after an uptick in 2020 (36 percent). Among U.S. respondents, a higher percentage are looking to make a career change (42 percent) which is, again, consistent with pre-pandemic levels (41 percent in 2019). 

International prospective students are more favorable on the use of standardized admissions tests.  

• Similar to pre-pandemic levels, about ten percent of prospective students say that having to take a standardized admissions test may deter them from applying. 

• About 60 percent of international students agree that standardized admissions tests improve fairness and reliability in evaluating applicants, and that they allow candidates to demonstrate academic readiness. Among U.S.-based prospective students, the number agreeing with those statements hovers closer to 50 percent. Similarly, while 63 percent of international respondents feel that standardized admissions tests increase transparency, just 55 percent of domestic respondents do. 

• While about half of respondents (52 percent) agree that test waivers make it easier to apply to a program, fewer agree that test waivers make it easier for applicants to gain admission (44 percent). 

• About 40 percent agree that the criteria to obtain a test waiver does not apply to a large proportion of applicants (43 percent) and the criteria to obtain a waiver is complex (40 percent). About one in five feel that schools should not offer test waivers for the 2021 admissions cycle. 

Law School Hiring Rebounds to Pre-Pandemic Levels

Entry-level hiring for graduating law school students returned to pre-pandemic levels after a dip in 2020. This is according to employment data released earlier this month by the American Bar Association (ABA). 

For the class of 2021, 76 percent obtained jobs requiring bar passage within ten months of graduation. This is an increase of four percentage points from the class of 2020. And 83 percent acquired full-time, long-term employment that either required bar passage or for which a J.D. was an advantage. This is an increase of six percentage points from 2020. 

Full-time employment that requires passing the bar

A Reuters analysis of the ABA employment data provides insight into those law schools with the largest percentages of graduates obtaining full-time employment that required bar passage. 

Columbia Law School landed at the top of the list with almost 96 percent of its 2021 graduating class. It was followed closely by the University of Chicago (93.9 percent), Duke (93.63 percent), and the University of Virginia (93.4 percent). 

While ten of the top 15 schools on this list were also ranked within the U.S. News & World Report top 14, there were also a few lower-cost and lower-ranked public law schools included. University of Georgia ranked fifth (92.57 percent), Texas Tech ranked twelfth (89.31 percent), and University of Montana (88.73 percent) held the fifteenth-highest percentage. 

See all of the top 15 law schools recognized for high rates of full-time employment requiring bar passage here. 

Federal clerkships

Reuters also provided an analysis of those law schools that place the most students into federal clerkships. Just three percent of 2021 graduates attained these highly-competitive placements. 

While Harvard Law School placed the highest number of students into federal clerkships (85), due to its large class, the proportion of its placements fell to just 15 percent. The University of Chicago—for the second year in a row—placed the largest percentage of its graduating class into federal clerkships at 27.7 percent. It was closely followed by Stanford (26.6 percent), Yale (19.72 percent), and the University of Virginia (15.72 percent). 

Reuter’s analysis noted that the large class sizes at the University of Virginia make its upward trajectory notable. 

See all of the top 15 law schools recognized for high rates of federal clerkship placements here.

Early Learning Experiences in Med School Shown to Impact Burnout, Empathy, and Career Regret

Early learning experiences in medical school impact students’ burnout, exhaustion, empathy, and career regret levels at graduation. A longitudinal study, published in JAMA, finds that medical students who report experiencing mistreatment prior to their second year have higher levels of burnout and career regret two years later. And the opposite also holds true. Students with positive experiences report lower burnout levels, higher empathy, and less career regret at graduation. 

The study, led by Liselotte Dyrbye, MD, MHPE, Daniel Satele, BA, and Colin West, MD, PhD, includes over 14,000 students from 140 allopathic medical schools who responded to the AAMC Medical School Year Two Questionnaire and the 2016-2018 AAMC Graduation Questionnaire.

The study findings show that just over three-quarters of students reported no mistreatment (77.1 percent) on the Year Two Questionnaire. Among the remaining 22.9 percent of students, 11.3 percent reported mistreatment in one instance, and 11.6 percent reported mistreatment in more than one instance. Within the group who experienced mistreatment more than once, the Graduation Questionnaires were more likely to indicate:

• Career choice regret (6.4 percent for those who never experienced mistreatment, 7 percent for once, and 11.4 percent for more than once)

• Greater exhaustion (mean scores: 12 for never, 13 for once, and 13.8 for more than once)

• Higher levels of disengagement (mean scores: 5.3 for never, 5.5 for once, and 6.0 for more than once)

Among those students who reported a more positive emotional climate on the Year Two Questionnaire, the relationships were the opposite. Their Graduation Questionnaires were more likely to show:

• Lower exhaustion levels (for each 1-point increase in emotional climate, there was a reduction by .05 in exhaustion) 

• Lower disengagement scores (for each 1-point increase in emotional climate, there was a reduction of .04 in disengagement)

Students who reported positive faculty interactions on the Year Two Questionnaire were more likely to receive higher empathy scores on the Graduation Questionnaire. And, positive interactions with other students resulted in lower instances of career regret at the conclusion of medical school. 

The study authors note that medical school administrators may use these findings to craft learning environments that “mitigate burnout, decline in empathy, and career choice regret among their students.” The authors write, "Although the most effective approaches to addressing mistreatment of learners remain elusive, the frequency of mistreatment varies between educational programs, suggesting there are likely to be levers within the control of the organization that adequate commitment, leadership, infrastructure, resources, and accountability can lead to a meaningful reduction in mistreatment." The authors also suggest that schools consider strategies to reduce stress among students and promote positive learning environments, such as installing learning communities, pass/fail grading, and faculty development. 

MedPage Today quoted Charles Griffith III, MD, of the University of Kentucky College of Medicine, who noted in a commentary on the study that, while the authors’ use of student-level, rather than institution-level data, limited the utility of the analysis, it may still inform interventions. "Some students in this study perceived mistreatment and did not believe the learning environment was supportive, but students from the same school believed the learning environment was indeed supportive," he wrote. "For a school considering change, based on these findings, does the school focus on making global changes to aspects of the overall learning environment, or do they identify students not supported by the current learning environment to tailor support on an individual level rather than a macro level?"

Profile of Recent MBA Alumni Shows a Shifting Student Base

The Financial Times has published its updated MBA alumni profile. Once again, it shows the ever-dynamic nature of the MBA degree and its student make-up. This year’s profile, in comparison with earlier alumni groups, showcases shifting demographics with greater percentages of alumni who are women, from the Asia-Pacific region, and fewer who went into banking. 

The profile uses data from the FT’s 2022 Global MBA rankings, which includes alumni from the top-100 ranked programs three years after graduation. We’ve listed the key insights below. 

• Reasons for Pursuing the MBA: Similar to the last two years, MBA alumni were most likely to name Personal Development and Management Development as their reasons for obtaining the degree. These two were followed by Improve Career Opportunities and Increase Salary as the third and fourth most highly-rated options. Falling to last place was Start Own Company, which most respondents rated at seven or below (out of ten) in importance. 

• Importance and Value of Courses. Alumni were asked to rate MBA courses in terms of importance and how well their alma mater teaches the subjects. Most alumni believe that General Management, Corporate Strategy, Entrepreneurship, and Finance are important and taught well. Alumni rated Organizational Behavior and Statistics/Quantitative Methods of average importance. However, they rated the performance of their schools higher for teaching Organizational Behavior than Statistics. Finally, Ethics and Environmental Issues and Fintech—two emerging topic areas for MBAs—were rated below average on both importance and performance. 

• Alumni demographics. Over time the makeup of the alumni profile has shifted significantly in terms of region of origin, gender, and post-MBA employment. 

  • In 2006, students from the US and Canada made up 50 percent of MBA alumni, however this proportion has declined steadily. Students from the Asia-Pacific region now make up the highest proportion at just under 40 percent. Students from the US and Canada fall next in line at just over 30 percent. 

  • While the percentage of women alumni held relatively steady at 33 percent between 2006 and 2014, it jumped significantly in 2022 with women now making up 40 percent of alumni three years post-graduation. 

  • The top sectors for post-MBA employment have also shifted over time. Declining steadily, finance/banking decreased from 31 percent of alumni in 2006 to 25 percent in 2014, and is down still further to 18 percent in 2022. The percentage of alumni in consulting has held relatively steady at 15 percent from 2006 to 2014, and has risen slightly to 17 percent in 2022. Not surprisingly, MBA alumni going into IT/Telecoms has increased over time, jumping from ten percent in 2006 to 14 percent in 2022. And, in 2022, e-commerce ranked among the top five employment sectors for the first time.

  • A demographic that has held relatively constant over time is age. The average alumni age, three years post-graduation, was 28 in 2006 and 2014, and increased slightly to 29 in 2022. 

• Since 2006, alumni salaries, both at graduation and three-years post-graduation, have increased by 28 percent. The FT notes that this is lower than the cumulative inflation rate of 37 percent over the same time period. In 2022, reported salaries for alumni three-years post-graduation are down compared to last year, which is the first time salaries have decreased year-over-year since 2014. 

Access the full alumni profile here. 

February Bar Exam Average Score Drops to Match All-Time Low

In a disappointing turn of events for many hopeful lawyers, the February 2022 bar exam results have dropped. The national average score decreased 1.4 points from last year’s February exam to 132.6, which matches the all-time low score garnered in February 2020. Of the twenty states who have reported their February bar exam results, twelve states’ pass rates have decreased. Just six states have seen increases and two states’ rates have held steady. 

New York—the largest bar exam jurisdiction—saw a decrease from 49 percent last year to 45 percent this year, and Florida experienced a similar decline, dropping from a 47 percent pass rate to 43 percent. Pennsylvania and North Carolina experienced more significant declines dropping 14 and ten percentage points, respectively. Among the six states with increasing pass rates were Illinois (up one percentage point from last year, to 43 percent), North Dakota (up 13 percentage points to an impressive 68 percent), and West Virginia (up eight percentage points to 56 percent). 

This year’s exam was notable in that it brought almost all test-takers back to in-person testing sites (with the exception of Nevada, which was experiencing the Omicron COVID-19 surge at the time). Last year, just 16 sites provided in-person testing while all others opted to provide the exam virtually due to the pandemic. 

The National Conference of Bar Examiners’ director of assessment and research, Rosemary Reshetar, reacted to the lower average by pointing out that various factors combine to influence the results. She noted that the February test cohort is smaller than it is for the July exam, which means that the scores tend to fluctuate more from year-to-year. She also said that this year’s February test-takers included more repeat examinees (68 percent) compared to the previous year, and that repeaters tend to have a higher fail rate than first time test-takers. 

Medical Researchers Gain Patient Experience Insights via Social Media Posts

Scrolling through Twitter may feel like a casual downtime activity, but a recent Wall Street Journal article describes social media’s growing utility as a medical research tool. Increasingly, researchers are using AI and other data-culling techniques, to sift through social media comments and gather real-time, unfiltered feedback on patient experiences—from the patients themselves. 

In an interview with the WSJ, Dr. Graciela Gonzalez-Hernandez, an Associate Professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine said, “Collecting abundant social-media data is cost-effective, does not involve burdening participants, and is available in real time.” She also points out that it may be more inclusive of populations often underrepresented in biomedical trials or cohort studies. And, most importantly, social media provides researchers direct access to unfiltered patient commentary on their experiences. “Healthcare providers report what they deem important, such that serious events are overrepresented, while bothersome side effects that may be of great importance to patients and lead to nonadherence and non-persistence are underrepresented,” Gonzalez-Hernandez said.

The article describes how researchers studying an opioid withdrawal drug have benefited from social media scans. Dr. Abeed Sarker, an Assistant Professor of Biomedical Informatics at Emory University, and his team used natural language processing algorithms to search Reddit for comments on opioid withdrawal experiences. Dr. Sarker’s team found that Reddit contributors frequently described concerns about withdrawal drugs causing “precipitated withdrawal,” or extreme withdrawal symptoms, among those who have used fentanyl. Importantly, many of these users’ comments expressed concern that their medical providers did not understand this condition. The study also found that the quantity of posts about fentanyl and withdrawal have increased over a seven-year period. These findings have played a key role in bringing to light the urgency of this issue for physicians researching withdrawal assistance drugs. 

In France, a similar study took place to better understand breast cancer patients’ quality of life. The researchers used an algorithm to scan comments left on Facebook and a French online forum for breast-cancer patients. Researchers compared these insights with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer’s quality of life questionnaire to ensure it was inclusive of the most pertinent topics. The online comments brought to light two additional topics that were top of mind for patients—nonconventional treatments and patients’ relationships with their families—which will be added to future iterations of the questionnaire for formal study. 

Many researchers seem intrigued by the possibility of using social media data in combination with traditional research. Su Golder, an Associate Professor at the University of York in England, is working on a medical literature review on HPV vaccines, which will incorporate Twitter and WebMD comments. “It’s important to research what the public is worried about,” Dr. Golder said. She notes that the benefits of social media data—patient perspectives and real-time information—can be meaningful, and that its shortcomings—comments that may confuse association with causation—can be overcome by combining the findings with traditional research efforts. 

Social media data might also work in combination with electronic medical records to improve patient care. A recent study by Dr. Munmun De Choudhury, an Associate Professor at Georgia Tech, created an algorithm to predict psychosis relapses and re-hospitalizations using the social media posts of 50 adult and adolescent psychosis patients who suffered relapses and hospitalization, along with their medical records. The study found that in the month preceding the relapse, there were distinct changes to social media usage in the form of language patterns—words related to “anger, death, or emotional withdrawal”—and the number of posts between midnight and 5am. The algorithm was able to accurately predict about 71 percent of relapses. Dr. De Choudhury is currently working with the state medical system to determine how to incorporate the algorithm into physicians’ clinical care processes. 

Growth Slowing for GRE in Business School Admissions

Applicants’ use of the GRE over the GMAT in MBA admissions continues to grow, but at a slower rate, according to a recent Poets & Quants analysis. For the past six admissions cycles (since 2016), GRE submissions have been increasing, while GMAT score submissions have been sinking significantly. The last two years, though, have shown a slowing in the GRE growth rate. The flexible test submission policies enacted in response to the pandemic have likely impacted the trend. 

GMAT testing volumes have declined annually since 2012, with the exception of 2016 when the numbers increased slightly compared to the year before. Last year’s GMAT testing volume decreased by 47.7 percent compared to 2018, the last pre-pandemic testing year. And the 2021 testing numbers totaled less than one-third of GMAT’s record-high numbers in 2012. 

Amidst this decline, the GRE testing volumes steadily increased. However, in the past couple of years, this growth has slowed significantly. Poets & Quants points out that, “For every Virginia Darden School of Business, which saw a 10-percentage-point increase in its GRE submissions from MBA applicants in 2021, there is an Indiana Kelley School of Business, which reported an 11-point year-to-year decline.” The analysis notes that in 2019, an average of 13.5 percent of applicants submitted GRE scores at the Poets & Quants-ranked top 25 business schools, but that number jumped to 27.8 percent in 2020. Within schools ranked in the top ten, the GRE submission averages all increased in 2020. Dartmouth’s Tuck led in GRE submissions at 39 percent, followed by Yale and UC-Berkeley at 35 percent. 

This year, within the top 25 schools (24 reported data), the average proportion of GRE submissions increased only slightly, from 27.8 percent to 28.5 percent. And, within the top ten, the average submissions decreased slightly from 28.1 percent in 2020 to 27.9 percent. Stanford, Columbia Business School, Dartmouth Tuck, Duke Fuqua, Michigan Ross, and NYU Stern all reported lower percentages of GRE submissions this year compared to last.

The longer-term trend from 2016 to 2021, though, actually paints a clearer picture of the GRE’s growing place in MBA admissions. Of the top 52 Poets & Quants-ranked MBA programs, 34 schools have increased in the percentage of GRE submissions over time, while just eight have decreased. None of the programs with decreases are ranked in the top 25. 

Female Law School Students Speak Up More in Small Classes and when Professors Use Systematic Methods for Student Participation

Women made up 57.4 percent of the 2021 incoming law school class according to LSAC data. But a new study confirms that they take up much less than half of the speaking time in required first-year lectures. Building on the “Speak Up” studies performed at elite law schools in the early  2000s on women’s participation in law courses, three professors at the University of Virgina— Molly Bishop Shadel, Sophie Trawalter, and J.H. Verkerke—designed three studies to better understand the dynamics at play. They found that while women do participate less than men, given certain conditions, there are structural changes that law professors can implement to promote more balanced classroom discourse. 

The first study was designed to understand the participation disparities between men and women. Using recordings of required first-year courses, Shadel found that the classroom discourse was disproportionately driven by men—62 percent of classroom utterances were attributed to men, while just 38 percent were from women. Men also spoke longer on average (302 seconds) than did women (194 seconds). Notably, the quality of the responses between genders was not significantly different, nor was the confidence displayed when providing the response (measured via use of verbal fillers and “qualified utterances” in the response). Shadel, describing the findings, said, “We saw that when answering cold calls, women spoke just as much as men, and they also spoke just as well and their answers were equally on point. The gender gap appeared when students were allowed to volunteer whether or not to participate.” Additionally, the gender gap occurred in lecture classes and disappeared entirely in classes with 30 or fewer students.

The second study asked students to self-report class participation at four points in time: at orientation, after the first semester, before the second year, and just prior to graduation. Women generally self-reported speaking less in class, however, the responses varied over time. Women reported speaking less in class after their first semester and before their second year. However, at orientation, women expected that they would speak as much as men, and nearer to graduation, they reported speaking as much as men. A disparity between the men and women occurred in the reasons they reported for not speaking. While men were more likely to say they didn’t speak due to a lack of interest in the subject-matter, women reported concerns about the size of the class, classmates’ judgment, or the professor’s personality and perceived supportiveness. Finally, women were also found to be significantly less positive about the Socratic Method than were men across all time periods. And, those students who expressed a greater dislike of the Socratic Method were also less likely to speak in class. 

The third and final study explored the perceived social backlash against class participation. The study authors surveyed the Class of 2021, who were in their third year and were taking courses in-person and online. Survey responses found that men and women reported speaking in similar amounts, and that both gender groups reported a fear of “backlash” after participating. Women reported feeling more backlash from women, and men from men; however, the highest-rated levels of backlash were by women and from women. 

Based upon the study findings, the authors provided recommendations for how law schools and professors might update the classroom environment to promote women’s participation:

• Reduce the number of large lecture courses and increase the number of smaller class (30 or fewer students) offerings 

• Rather than relying solely on volunteers, implement a systematic plan for calling on students to speak in class to drive a more diverse range of participation 

• Reduce reliance on the Socratic method or update the method from cold-calling to letting students know when they will be expected to participate

• Ensure that there is a clear expectation for all students to participate in classroom discourse to reduce the backlash against students who do

Shadel noted her firm belief that every student can learn to articulate their thoughts confidently and well in a classroom setting if given the opportunity. “You need to be able to take a deep breath and just do it,” she said. “If we are making it hard for students to take that deep breath because we’re putting them in a group of 90 people and putting them on the spot only one time, then I don’t think we’re serving them well.”

Medical Students Push for Climate-Related Health Courses

Emory Medical School, at the behest of its student population, has formally incorporated the health impacts of climate change into the medical school curriculum. The addition, which follows many public health programs throughout the country, makes Emory the latest elite medical school to incorporate climate-related health courses. 

Emory’s decision—and the student pressure behind it—falls in line with an article published last fall in The Journal of Climate Change and Health. In the article, survey results (including responses from 600 students from 12 medical schools) showed that most medical students want to include climate change in their studies. 83.9 percent of respondents believed that climate change and its health effects should be included within the core medical school curriculum. 13 percent believed that their school currently provided adequate education on the topic. And just 6.3 percent of students said that they felt “very prepared” to discuss how climate change can affect health with a patient. 

Momentum around educating students on climate change is growing within the medical community. Emory joins Johns Hopkins University, Harvard, Yale, and the University of Washington among others. Johns Hopkins created its Environmental Health Institute in 2007, and in 2017 Columbia University unveiled its Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education. Columbia’s Consortium, which develops best practices for teaching climate health, has now grown to include 47 U.S. medical schools as members, as well as more than 240 schools of medicine, nursing, public health, dentistry, and veterinary medicine globally. 

Additionally, the American Medical Association has endorsed teaching medical students about the impacts of the climate on health. “All physicians, whether in training or in practice for many years, have to be able to assess for, manage, and effectively treat the health effects of climate change,” Lisa Howley, PhD and AAMC Senior Director of Strategic Initiatives and Partnerships said. 

The AAMC understands that there will be some resistance to climate health’s inclusion in already packed curriculums, and have highlighted a few ways climate change has been meaningfully integrated into current medical curriculums:

• At the University of Illinois College of Medicine (Urbana-Champaign), climate-related health risks have been incorporated into case scenarios to promote a physician’s consideration of the environment along with other contextual factors. The physician also learns to incorporate and consider not just medical treatment, but also environmental mitigation factors (masks, HVAC filters, etc.).

• At the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (New York City), climate information has been integrated into existing medical content for first- and second-year students. For example, slides that cover Lyme disease also include information on how climate change impacts tick habitats. The information is designed to complement existing content.

• At the University of Colorado School of Medicine, an elective course for fourth-year students titled “Climate Medicine,” incorporates op-ed writing in addition to climate and health content.

• At the University of California San Francisco Medical School, medical students partner with nursing and dentistry students to create the Human Health and Climate Change group to facilitate educational forums and on-campus sustainability initiatives.

INSEAD Announces Immersive Virtual Reality Masterclass for Global Executive MBAs

INSEAD Business School just announced that it would be further incorporating virtual reality (VR) into the learning experience of Global Executive MBA students by offering an immersive, masterclass titled “Mission to Mars.” The simulation will refine students’ management skills and provide an opportunity to exercise decision making in situations filled with ambiguity. After the experience, students will debrief their experiences together. 

INSEAD’s announcement follows a study by PWC on the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) based training for soft skills development. The study compared results for three similar cohorts who received training via different delivery mechanisms: classroom, e-learn and v-learn (VR). The results showed that the VR learners were four times faster to learn than classroom learners, 275 percent more confident in applying the material, 3.75 times more connected to the material than classroom learners, and four times more focused than e-learners. 

Ithai Stern, the Academic Director for INSEAD’s VR Immersive Learning Initiative, has previously provided insights into the lessons INSEAD has learned from experiences with VR, in the classroom and remotely, as a learning tool for its MBA and Executive Education students. Similar to the findings of the PWC study, Stern has found VR to be highly effective, and also noted that the best ways incorporate VR are through individual study and case studies. 

“In INSEAD courses, a VR headset, which is responsive to real-time head movements, allows a unique experience for each participant within the framework of fixed content (e.g., a boardroom scenario, a factory tour, or a market). As a result, participants can think through a specific situation in a low-risk, controlled environment, testing decisions and assumptions without being judged by fellow participants—and without being unduly influenced by any higher-ups that may also be in attendance. To benefit the group as a whole, these individual virtual experiences are typically preceded and followed by in-depth shared discussion,” he wrote.

Stern also acknowledges the unique ability of VR to promote empathy within students by placing them into new contexts previously not possible. “For example, it's the first time in history where, when I teach directors, I can literally position the 50 plus white male in the classroom in the body of the only black woman on the board of directors,” he said.

Stern, however, does point out that while VR is an excellent supplement to the business school curriculum, it is not a replacement for the “knowledge, feedback, and guidance” that professors, and classroom discourse provides students after their VR simulations. Other business school leaders, interviewed by the Financial Times on the use of technology in business school, take a more cautious approach to the use of VR suggesting that while it could be useful to simulate a real-life situation, it may be less practical due to its individualized nature and the equipment demands.