Medical School Admissions

U.S. News and World Report Takes Down Law School and Medical School Rankings Previews

The U.S. News and World Report just removed the Best Law School and Best Medical School previews, which were posted earlier this month. In place of the previews, which showed the Top 14 Law Schools and Top 15 Medical Schools: Research, U.S. News posted this announcement, which explains that the organization has received a number of data update requests from law and medical schools:

As U.S. News previously announced, we are dealing with an unprecedented number of inquiries during our embargo period for the 2023-2024 Best Graduate Schools, including requests from law and medical schools to update data submitted after the collection period.

While we address these inquiries, we have removed the preview content for the 2023-2024 Best Medical Schools: Research and 2023-2024 Best Law Schools rankings published here on April 11. As previously noted, the rankings are not final until they are published in their entirety on USNews.com.

The previews’ removal falls after two announced delays in the publication of the full rankings for law and medical schools. The organization has not yet provided an expected publication date for the rankings, although it published other graduate school rankings, including business schools, today. 

U.S. News and World Report Postpones Law and Medical School Rankings Indefinitely

The U.S. News and World Report just announced that the release of the “Best Law School” and “Best Medical School” rankings will be postponed indefinitely. The news comes shortly after the organization delayed the publication of all graduate rankings by a week, from April 18th to April 25th, to account for additional data review and validation. U.S. News still plans to publish all other graduate program rankings, including business schools, on April 25th. 

The withdrawal of many law and medical schools from the rankings earlier this year spurred U.S. News to depend more heavily on publicly available data than in the past. After publishing a preview of the top 14 ranked law schools and top 15 ranked medical research programs earlier this month, the organization allowed school officials the opportunity to review the data under an embargo period. This standard practice led to an “unprecedented” number of questions and calls for additional review, which has apparently led to the delay. 

In a letter written to the U.S. News and shared with Reuters, Harvard Law Assistant Dean Marva de Marothy wrote, "Although we no longer participate in the U.S. News rankings, we expect the magazine to use accurate, publicly available numbers if it intends to continue to make representations about our law school.” 

2024 AMCAS Work & Activities Section Will Include New Experience Category: Social Justice/Advocacy

The American Medical College Application Service (AMCAS) just announced that the 2024 application will include a new experience category in the Work and Activities section: Social Justice/Advocacy.  

AMCAS defines a social justice/advocacy experience as “one in which the applicant worked to advance the rights, privileges, or opportunities of a person, a group of people, or a cause.” It is specifically noted that experiences in this category do not need to be tied to any particular ideology, and that the category is “not intended to solicit experiences campaigning for a particular political candidate or party.” Rather, it is based on the applicant’s understanding of social justice/advocacy.

AMCAS provides examples of social justice/advocacy activities, which include: Registering people to vote, advocating for civil rights, decreasing health inequities, addressing food deserts, building awareness for a particular cause or health condition, advocating for vulnerable populations (children, homeless, etc.), and assisting with policy change or development. Previously, some applicants might have included advocacy work and social justice-related volunteering in other categories.

It's likely that you’ve already had experiences that will fall into this category. If so, we recommend that you include them. More schools are emphasizing social justice in their mission statements—and they’re looking for students whose values align with theirs.

As you consider this new category, remember these tips:

  • Provide specific information about your social justice/advocacy experiences instead of making broad or generalized statements. For what specific issues did you advocate? What vulnerable population did you intend to benefit? What actions did you take on behalf of this issue/population? What did you learn that will make you a more effective member of the medical community?

  • Avoid using overly-political or inflammatory language in your description. You want to resonate with a broad audience. Keep your description centered on the issues or population for which you worked and explore how it prepared you for medical school and your future career.

  • While showing dedication to social justice and advocacy is important to admissions committees, ensure that you come across as well-rounded and include experiences across many different categories. If you have many social justice/advocacy experiences, select the strongest few to share or group them together. Consider the efforts where you played a meaningful leadership role, issues that you have a particular passion for, or experiences that relate directly to the mission of a school where you are applying.

  • Conversely, if you don’t have any of these experiences, first think carefully about your volunteer activities and if there are components of those activities that may fit into this category. A good deal of volunteer work advocates for vulnerable populations or seeks to change an issue. However, if you are unsure or uncomfortable, don’t try to stretch an experience to make it fit. While this is a meaningful category for the medical community, there are many other experiences that will also prove your readiness for medical school.

Johns Hopkins Takes Top Spot in U.S. News’ Best Research Medical Schools Ranking Preview

In the U.S. News’ preview of its 2024 Best Medical Schools (Research), Johns Hopkins University overtook perennial leader, Harvard, for the top rank. The full rankings will be released April 18th.  

In addition to the noteworthy change at the top, significant movement occurred elsewhere within the top-ranked schools when compared to the 2023 rankings. 

  • University of Michigan and Northwestern University entered the elite tier of medical schools, climbing to 9th and 12th, respectively, from a tie at 17th last year. 

  • Three schools dropped out of the top 15: University of Washington (ranked 8th in 2023), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ranked 11th in 2023), and Vanderbilt University (ranked 13th in 2023). 

  • NYU Grossman saw a sharp decline, although it still remained in the top 15, falling from 2nd in 2023 to 13th in 2024. 

  • Washington University in St. Louis climbed seven spots from last year, moving from the 11th rank in 2023, to tie for 4th in 2024. 

Rank School

1 Johns Hopkins University, +2 from 2023

2 University of Pennsylvania (Perelman), +4

3 Harvard University, -2

4 University of California—San Francisco (tie), -1

4 Washington University in St. Louis (tie), +7

6 Columbia University, -3

7 Stanford University (tie), +1

7 Yale University (tie), +3

9 Duke University (tie), -3

9 University of Michigan—Ann Arbor (tie), +8

11 University of Pittsburgh, +3

12 Northwestern University (Feinberg), +5

13 New York University (Grossman), -11

14 Cornell University (Weill) (tie), no change

14 Mayo Clinic School of Medicine (Alix) (tie), no change

U.S. News has also made changes to their ranking methodology, which includes the addition of a research quality metric, increased weight given to faculty-student ratios, and a reduced weight for reputation surveys, MCAT, and GPA scores.

Briefly addressing the departure of many medical schools from the rankings—including those at Harvard, Columbia, Stanford, University of Pennsylvania, Cornell, Duke and University of Chicago—U.S. News explained that it ranked all schools using publicly available data from the National Institutes of Health, as well as data submitted through surveys in 2023 (or 2022 if 2023 was not available).  

AMCAS 2024: “Disadvantaged Applicant” Question Revised to Broader Adversity Question

The AMCAS “disadvantaged applicant” question is no more. This year’s AMCAS application has introduced a new question in its place that asks more broadly about an applicant’s “impactful experiences.” 

The 2024 AMCAS application will now include the following question and guidance: 

Other Impactful Experiences 

To provide some additional context around each individual’s application, admissions committees are interested in learning more about the challenges applicants may have overcome in life. The following question is designed to give you the opportunity to provide additional information about yourself that is not easily captured in the rest of the application. 

Please consider whether this question applies to you. Medical schools do not expect all applicants to answer “yes” to this question. This question is intended for applicants who have overcome major challenges or obstacles. Some applicants may not have experiences that are relevant to this question.  Other applicants may not feel comfortable sharing personal information in their application.  

o Yes o No 

Please use the space below to describe why you selected “yes.” [This text and the textbox only appear if “yes” is selected for this question.] 

In a pop-up box, AMCAS provides some helpful examples. It reads:

The following examples can help you decide whether you should respond “yes” to the question, and if so, what kinds of experiences you could share. Please keep in mind that this is not a fully inclusive list and any experiences you choose to write about should be ones that directly impacted your life opportunities. 

Example Experiences 

  • Family background: serving as a caretaker of a family member (e.g., siblings, parent/guardian), first generation to college 

  • Community setting: rural area, food scarcity, high poverty or crime rate, lack of access to regular health care (e.g., primarily used urgent care clinics or emergency room, no primary care physician) 

  • Financial background: low-income family, worked to support family growing up, work-study to pay for college, federal or state financial support 

  • Educational experience: limited educational opportunities, limited access to advisors or counselors who were knowledgeable/supportive of higher education requirements 

  • Other general life circumstances that were beyond your control and impacted your life and/or presented barriers (e.g., religion) 

Why the change?

The AAMC made the revision in response to “limitations” identified with the previous question, which asked a candidate if they wished to identify themself as a “disadvantaged applicant.” Research into the text found that applicants found the question ambiguous, and that many had a negative reaction to the use of the term “disadvantaged applicant.” 

However, AAMC’s research also found that both applicants and admissions officers found value in the intent of the question, which was “to provide rich contextual information about an applicant’s journey and how their lived experiences align with schools’ missions and/or the communities they serve.” 

The revised question and associated guidance was piloted using the Summer Health Professions Education Program and the supplemental Electronic Residency Application Service. And both the question and guidance received “generally positive feedback” from administrators and applicants. 

Should I respond to this question?

As with the question that preceded it, this question text states that not all candidates are expected to respond. Rather, it is intended for those who have had “major challenges or obstacles.” 

That being said, this updated question provides applicants with a broader scope for responses. So, we urge you to consider any significant challenges that you have faced, using the following questions:

  1. Did this experience impact my life in such a way that it provides meaningful context to my application? 

Examples of such adversity include: Facing a significant health challenge such as cancer or a disability; serving as the guardian to your younger siblings, while also attending classes (likely, negatively impacting your resume); living in an underserved medical community that made it difficult to gain shadowing or clinical experiences, but also inspired your interest in rural medicine. 

Alternatively, more typical experiences that likely do not represent significant adversity (but potentially belong in your personal statement or secondary essays) include: Breaking a bone during high school athletics and going through a difficult recuperation process; facing a life-impacting food allergy, the dissolution of a romantic relationship, a domestic move, and/or your parents’ divorce. While these experiences likely impacted you greatly, they may not belong in this response. 

2. What did I learn from the experience? 

Your essay response should detail the adversity, but should center on what you learned from going through the experience. Did this experience provide you with an “ah-ha!” moment that changed your perspective and impacted your life? If the take-aways from the adversity do not feel relevant to your application (i.e., your learnings do not clearly make you a stronger candidate for a medical school), you should reconsider the take-aways or including the experience.

3. Have I already spoken to this experience in my personal statement? 

You will want to avoid redundancy by sharing different stories and anecdotes in this essay and your personal statement. If you fully explored the experience in your personal statement, do not feel compelled to re-write about the experience here. Not all applicants are expected to have responses to this question. 

Your writing approach:

Overcoming adversity makes for a stronger medical school candidate and this is what you will want to emphasize in your response: Provide the reader background on the situation in the first 20 percent of the response. But the remaining 80 percent should be devoted to what you learned from the adversity.

How will your future classmates and patients benefit from the lessons you gained from the adversity? Keep in mind the qualities that medical schools are looking for in prospective students and show the reader how your experience improved your dedication to medicine and resilience and/or your abilities in leadership, teamwork, empathy, and critical and creative thinking.

Some Students Don’t Match on Residency Match Day. Do they Need More Support?

Match rates improved across all applicant types in the 2023 National Match. U.S. MD seniors garnered a 93.7 percent match rate (+0.8 percentage points from 2022) and U.S. DOs achieved an all-time high with a match rate of 91.6 percent (+0.3 percentage points from 2022). Among international medical graduates, who historically match at lower rates, U.S. citizens achieved a record high match rate of 67.6 percent (+6.2 percentage points from 2022) and non-U.S. citizens matched at a rate of 59.4 percent (+1.3 from 2022).

The Match generally brought positive feedback for the improving rates, but what about those who don’t match? “After the match, of course, there's an uptick [in calls] every year," said Pamela Wible, MD and Founder/Operator of a mental health helpline for doctors and medical students. "Matchless medical students reach out to me who don't know what to do with their lives, sitting on $300,000 of student loans, sobbing on their couch" continued Dr. Wible, in a MedPage article published after the 2021 Match.

A recent MedScape op-ed considers the challenges for matchless medical students and urges the medical community to provide more proactive and structured advice and guidance on how to navigate not matching to a position. The authors suggest the following ways that medical schools or national medical organizations can offer more meaningful support: 

  • Prior to Match Day, organizations can facilitate webinars/meetings that both normalize not matching to a position and also provide guidance on useful actions. The meeting might include topics such as how to adjust career plans, approach loan repayment, enter the SOAP process, explore alternative positions in research or other fields, and reapply to a future Match process. 

  • Medical schools should focus on providing mental health support services and ensuring that students know how to access these resources both prior to, on, and after Match Day. In addition to providing access to emergency counseling services, the authors suggest that schools offer stress reduction workshops/tips and opt-out mental health services prior to the Match.

  • Finally, schools and the medical community must work together to destigmatize not matching. Students should feel comfortable and safe pursuing next steps knowing that their school and the wider medical community will support them as they determine how they will continue to pursue their dream of practicing medicine. 

“Stay in touch with your dean and others at your medical school and ask them for help…Also, get involved in a research project. Look for mentors at your medical school who are working in the field of medicine you want to work in and volunteer to help,” said Margarita Loeza, MD, MPH and Assistant Dean of Student Affairs and Admissions at the Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science in AMA article published last month. 

Learn How to Accept Critical Feedback Before Starting Medical School

This blog is the first in a new series that we are publishing on the soft skills that all premedical students should develop prior to starting medical school. While your academic preparation has been underway for many years, we don’t want you to forget about those skills we believe will be vital to your success in medical school (and beyond).

Many pre-medical students have spent the majority of their lives receiving praise and playing starring roles both inside and outside of the classroom. Your commitment to success is part of why you made it into medical school, but it can also make the transition particularly tough. Medical school is not only a challenging academic environment, it is a time filled with new experiences and, accordingly, a lot of mistakes. You will get critical feedback in large doses. 

“My first piece of written feedback during my clinical year was ripe with criticism. I regrettably reacted to it by reading and re-reading it, allowing discouragement and imposter’s syndrome to slowly infiltrate my psyche. My voice began quivering during my presentations on rounds. My thoughts quickly became consumed with what every attending might be thinking of me at any given moment. It became harder to concentrate and learn. I stood in my own way, allowing my dependence on external validation to hamper my professional growth,” said Nabeel Salka, a third-year medical student at the University of Michigan, in a personal essay.  

In preparation for medical school, we want you to gain some comfort with the discomfort. We urge you to practice requesting and receiving negative feedback because feedback plays a critical role in performance and leadership effectiveness. Dr. Sheila Heen, a lecturer at Harvard Law School and author of Thanks for the Feedback: The Science and Art of Receiving Feedback Well, regularly references research that says those who regularly seek critical feedback report higher job satisfaction, adapt better into new roles, and receive higher performance reviews than those who do not seek out feedback. 

But it’s not always easy. Dr. Heen points out that feedback can cause various “trigger” responses, such as truth triggers, relationship triggers, and identity triggers that make it difficult to productively receive the provider’s message. 

--Truth triggers: When we question the veracity of the feedback. We may feel misunderstood, wronged, or indignant, and we are more likely to reject the feedback or go on the defensive.

--Relationship triggers: When the person providing the feedback colors how we receive it. We may feel targeted or bullied. 

--Identity triggers: When feedback hits at how we see ourselves. We may feel shaken, confused, and particularly sensitive. 

So, once you identify your triggers, what’s the next step? Tasha Eurich, organizational psychologist and executive coach, provides guidelines for overcoming the initial emotional reaction, and accepting critical feedback for the useful tool that it is. 

--Don’t rush it. Negative feedback is inherently uncomfortable and emotional. Sit with the discomfort, feel the emotions, and don’t feel compelled to respond to feedback immediately. While researching for her book, Insight, Eurich interviewed a group of people who dramatically improved in self-awareness. Within this group, two clear patterns emerged: First, she found that they made a habit of seeking out critical feedback (although many agreed it was “unpleasant”). Second, after receiving feedback, they took their time, days or even weeks, to respond. During this reflection period, some worked to transform their view of the feedback from an emotional reaction (e.g, “upsetting”) to a rational one (e.g, “helpful and productive data”). Others used “self-affirmation” techniques such as considering their many good qualities (“I am a committed medical student.'') to contextualize the feedback into a broader picture, thus making it feel less threatening.  

--Gather more data. Request additional data points via feedback from others to understand the situation more completely. Is this feedback relevant to many interactions or is it an outlier? Find out if others agree and what additional context they can provide. In addition to providing a more complete picture and reducing personal blind spots, the additional data can help inform an improvement strategy. 

--Don’t choose isolation. There is a real tendency for people to cut off relationships with those who provide negative feedback, to their own detriment. Eurich references research by Marshall Goldsmith and Howard Morgan, who tracked 11,000 leaders within a leadership development program; the contingent who received critical feedback and continued to engage with their coworkers made dramatic behavioral improvements, while those who didn’t were much less likely to see improvement. Maintaining relationships with those who provide difficult feedback drives better progression over time. 

Within medicine, particularly in the clinical setting, there are additional barriers to feedback beyond our own emotional responses. An article in the NEJM Resident 360 identifies the following: not enough time, conflicting priorities, lack of physical/private space to provide feedback, power differentials (particularly for upward feedback), lack of (enough) observations, and a lack of a growth mindset (receiver). Understanding these barriers can help you to create structures to overcome them, such as seeking out feedback on a routine basis, learning to identify feedback in whatever form it may come, gaining comfort in hearing feedback publicly, and accepting that some feedback may not be valid due to a lack of observations. 

Nabeel Salka ended his personal essay by describing the power he felt when he learned to accept negative feedback for what it is, a growth opportunity rather than an indictment of his abilities as a physician. He wrote, “Nearly a year after receiving my first piece of written feedback, I read it again. This time I didn’t feel hurt or ashamed. In fact, I felt like I understood the actual content of the criticism for the first time. Rather than concerning myself with the grade and how much the resident disapproved of my performance, I learned that I could be more organized when presenting.” 

Starting medical school with an ability to see criticism as a learning moment, and nothing more, will allow you to enjoy and take advantage of challenging opportunities in this unique period of your life.

555 Vacant Emergency Medicine Resident Positions Remain Following National Match Day

According to social media reports, this year's National Resident Matching Program left 555 unfilled positions in emergency medicine. While the positions will likely be filled in the Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program, it is noteworthy because, as recently as three to four years ago, the specialty was among the most competitive. This year’s number of vacancies more than doubled last year’s 219 unfilled positions, but in 2021 just 14 vacancies remained post-match. 

Several emergency medicine groups published a joint statement reacting to the open positions on the American College of Emergency Physicians website. In the statement, they noted that a combination of many factors likely influenced this year’s outcome. “Many have speculated about factors such as workforce projections, increased clinical demands, emergency department (ED) boarding, economic challenges, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the corporatization of medicine, among many others.”  

An interview between Medscape and Robert McNamara, MD, Chair of Emergency Medicine at Temple University and Chief Medical Officer of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine, provided additional insight into two of the factors: workforce projections and the corporatization of emergency medicine. In December 2021, the Annals of Emergency Medicine published a study projecting an oversupply of emergency physicians by 2030. In McNamara’s view, the suggestion of an oversupply may have deterred prospective entrants into the field who worry about finding a job and repaying loans. 

"Emergency medicine residents always have among the highest debt of any specialty," McNamara said. "They have a strong sense of social justice and often don't come from privileged backgrounds ... so they're likely to accumulate debt."

He also added that emergency medicine positions tend to fall under corporate entities more often than physician-run groups. The corporate focus on profit can lead to burnout and a lack of “physician autonomy.” 

Moving forward, the joint statement announced the creation of a Match Task Force with heavy emergency medicine representation to further understand the reasoning behind the unfilled positions and create mitigation strategies for the future.

The Chairman and CEO of U.S. News & World Report Accuses Elite Law and Medical Schools of Evading Accountability

The U.S. News & World Report has publicly defended its rankings, hitting back at the elite law and medical schools that have staged public boycotts. Eric Gertler, Executive Chairman and CEO of U.S. News & World Report, penned a Wall Street Journal op-ed, which was ffollowed a day later by a full-page ad in the Boston Globe timed to coincide with a conference hosted by Harvard and Yale Law Schools on “best practices in data.” 

While US News & World Report’s previous response to the boycott focused on responding to criticisms of the methodology and seeking collaboration, more recently, they have taken a defensive stance. Gertler’s op-ed not only defended the rankings, but also leveled sharp accusations towards the withdrawing schools. He accused them of evading accountability and not wanting to rely on an independent third party that they cannot control. Gertler then went on to tie the schools’ decision to withdraw from the rankings to the Supreme Court’s current review of the use of affirmative action in school admissions decisions. He proposes that elite schools are currently de-emphasizing GPA and standardized test scores in admissions, in advance of the decision, to provide themselves more leeway in the future. 

“There is added urgency as the Supreme Court considers a pair of cases on affirmative action that could change admission norms. Some law deans are already exploring ways to sidestep any restrictive ruling by reducing their emphasis on test scores and grades—criteria used in our rankings,” Gertler wrote.

In defending the rankings, which Gertler admits cannot accommodate every nuance in educational excellence, he points to the ranking’s ability to provide “accurate, comprehensive information that empowers students to compare institutions and identify the factors that matter most to them.” And, he concludes, the elite schools that have withdrawn have ended their participation in a critical national discourse about what constitutes excellence in education. 

Make the Most of Your Relationship with Your Pre-Health Advisor

A pre-med/pre-health advisor can be an invaluable resource. In addition to providing academic support, they can tell you about the school’s internal processes (such as requesting letters of evaluation), as well as available shadowing, clinical, and/or research opportunities. But, to make the most of your advisor relationship—you must invest in it. Below, we’ve compiled our top tips for making the most of your relationship with your pre-health advisor. 

  1. Find a good fit. Meet with your assigned advisor early, and determine if you have a good rapport. Ensure they have extensive experience guiding students into medical school, and that they are accessible and responsive. You may have the option to find an alternative advisor if it isn’t a good fit, so that’s why starting early is key.  

  2. Early in your undergraduate career, you should plan to meet with your advisor at least one or two times per semester. In your junior and senior years, particularly before and during the time you are actively working on your application, you will want to meet more frequently. We recommend setting up time to meet at least once a month. Many advisors work with a large number of students so, instead of trying to squeeze into their calendars last minute, plan ahead. 

  3. Take advantage of other resources that your school provides to help you stay informed and up-to-date on the medical school application process. Sign up for pre-health newsletters, digital resources, and/or clubs. You can then use your meetings with your advisor for more personalized guidance.

  4. Make the most of your time together. Create an agenda for each meeting so that you can address all of your open items and use your time efficiently. In advance of the meeting, update your application timeline and resume, share any key goals or questions that you’d like to discuss during the meeting, and follow-up after meetings with any outstanding actions or questions. 

Five Qualities Medical School Admissions Committees are Looking for in Applicants

Throughout your medical school primary and secondary applications, you will want to highlight the following skills and qualities. 

Leadership. This is a key quality that separates physicians from other members of a healthcare provider team. Throughout your application, you will want to showcase your ability to lead a team in order to accomplish a common goal. Consider the role you play within a group and how you help bring out the best in other team members. You don’t need to be the captain of a sports team or a club president to be a highly-effective and persuasive leader. Rather, you need to be able to articulate how your influence and openness promote the best outcome(s) in a collaborative environment. 

In what meaningful experiences did you show your leadership abilities? Did leadership come naturally to you, or did you work to get to this place? (Both things are great!) How did you support your team? Did you encourage collaboration or independence? Did you feel supported by your team? Did you experience any pushback, and how did you handle that if you did? What did you think about these things at the time? How did you feel? What did you learn that you will incorporate into your leadership style in the future?

Teamwork:  Medical school and the practice of medicine are often team endeavors. While we’ve encouraged you to showcase your ability to lead a team, you will also want to show your ability to work collaboratively and productively with others. Highlight instances where you have shown humility and elevated the voices of others. Think about your most effective team experiences and what you learned about yourself from working with those teammates. 

During what meaningful experiences did you work with a team or collaborate with others successfully? Were you working with people unlike yourself? Was there a struggle for balance in the beginning? Any confusion? What did you appreciate about your team members? How did they influence and impact you and your actions? Did one or two team members step up in a way you admired? What did you think about these things at the time? How did you feel? Have you had experiences with teams that were unsuccessful? What did you learn (remember: failures can provide great insight too!)?

Critical and creative thinking. The practice of medicine requires constant engagement with problem solving, from interacting with patients to coming to a diagnosis and treatment plan to driving research and innovation agendas. You will need to ask good questions and consider the interplay of multiple variables. Showcase the critical thinking skills you’ve already developed, as well as your ability to stay calm when faced with complicated issues.

In what meaningful experiences did you utilize critical thinking and problem-solving skills? How did you determine the best course of action? Did you approach something one way at first and then correct yourself? What did you think about these things at the time? What did you learn? How did you feel?

Intellectual curiosity. Medical school is academically rigorous, and schools want students who can not only handle the workload, but will elevate the classroom discourse by engaging deeply with the material. And, beyond school, medicine is an ever-evolving field. Throughout your career, you will be asked to take on new challenges and employ innovative thinking. Just demonstrating a record of academic success is not enough. Rather, you will want to show the admissions committee examples of situations where you went beyond what was required to better comprehend a topic. Keep in mind that you can demonstrate intellectual curiosity in an academic environment but also beyond it—at work or in your participation with a charity or hobby. 

In what meaningful experiences did you demonstrate intellectual curiosity? How have you gone above and beyond the expected to better understand a topic? In what ways have you pursued additional knowledge or sought out learning opportunities? How have you taken your interest to the next level? How did it make you feel? 

Empathy and the ability to connect with others: Medical schools are highly-attuned to the interpersonal capabilities of applicants. Share experiences where you demonstrate empathy, listening skills, and the ability to form connections. Showcase situations in your life where you overcame obvious differences with others to form a respectful relationship. Make it clear that you always treat others with humility and respect and that you will see your patients as full people, rather than as a set of symptoms or a puzzle to be solved. 

In what meaningful experiences did you empathize and connect with others? What effect did you have on others? What effect did they have on you? What did you think about these things at the time? How did you feel? What have you learned about how to find common ground with those who are different from you? Do you have any examples of times that forming a good relationship with someone else led you both to a better outcome?

Amidst Tech Turmoil, Physicians and Medical Students Use Social Media as a Platform for Medical Education and Combating Misinformation

In the summer of 2021, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy issued a report calling the distribution of medical misinformation through social media an “urgent threat to public health.” And this week, amidst a turbulent period for tech companies marked by extensive layoffs, a New York Times article identified a trend of social media companies divesting in the fight against misinformation. The article said, “Last month, the company [YouTube], owned by Google, quietly reduced its small team of policy experts in charge of handling misinformation, according to three people with knowledge of the decision. The cuts, part of the reduction of 12,000 employees by Google’s parent company, Alphabet, left only one person in charge of misinformation policy worldwide, one of the people said. And YouTube is not alone. The cuts reflect a trend across the industry that threatens to undo many of the safeguards that social media platforms put in place in recent years to ban or tamp down on disinformation ….”

Despite declining resources at social media companies, the medical community appears willing to step up to address the gap. In the past we’ve highlighted the efforts of medical schools to prepare students to take on medical misinformation, which ranges from large investments in institutions for research and study, to incorporating communications and social media techniques into the medical school classroom. There are also a number of physicians and medical students who are building vibrant social media communities for the purpose of proactively circulating accurate and understandable medical information. Below, we profile just a few of the physicians who are engaging audiences via social media with reliable and focused medical information. 

  • Dr. Lisa Fitzpatrick, founder of Grapevine Media, creates content specifically geared towards a population that the mainstream health system tends to ignore. Her company, which creates “Ask a Doctor” videos and posts them on social media, seeks to provide medical information for people of color and/or those of low socioeconomic status. The videos feature doctors of color who answer medical questions in clear terms and with actionable advice for this audience, keeping in mind the challenges borne by those with low incomes. In an interview with NPR, Dr. Fitzpatrick noted that educating people won’t resolve all their barriers to good health, but she reiterated her belief that information can improve wellbeing. "To me, it's so clear all roads lead to trusted health information and understanding health and health care," she said. "But the challenge is how to make it obvious to everybody else." Dr. Fitzpatrick is currently pitching the video content to insurance companies as a means to improve the health of these hard-to-reach populations, while also reducing insurers’ costs.

  • Joel Bervell, a 4th-year medical student at Washington State University School of Medicine, creates TikTok videos that highlight areas of racial bias in medicine. He told Medscape in an interview that he views himself as a “medical myth buster.” He educates his 600,000 plus followers on biases in medicine that can negatively impact care for people of color. Medscape provided an example of this goal by describing one of his TikTok videos, “... he explains that the equation used to measure kidney function (glomerular filtration rate [GFR]) has a built-in "race adjustment" that increases the GFR for all Black patients. ‘That overestimation could mean that 3.3 million Black Americans would have had a higher stage of kidney disease and missed out on care and treatment,’ said Bervell.” 

  • StatNews described a joint effort by a group of physicians to support a twitter feed, “Health News Around the World,” with vetted, up-to-date health news and stories. 

  • Dr. Will Bulsiewicz, MD, runs an Instagram account to provide his 462,000 followers with information on nutrition and promoting a healthy gut via his account “TheGutHealthMD”. His feed answers questions, reviews products, links to podcasts, corrects misinformation, and provides followers with indicators of healthy or unhealthy bodily functioning.

Related: Medical Schools Train Students to Combat Medical Misinformation

Crafting Your Personal Statement: Lessons from Memoir Writing

A memoir requires more than a recounting of events from your life. Rather, you must show the reader that you’ve experienced transcendence. Marion Roach Smith calls it the “golden rule” of memoir. She writes, Memoir is not about what you did. Memoir is about what you did with it.” The experience is not the focus or the reason for the writing, just the vessel for sharing a more universal learning with your audience. 

Smith expands this thought when she writes, “Specifically memoir is a promise from me that I experienced something, I’ve given some real thought to it and now know what it is, and now I am going to share what I now know with you. The promise is not that I am going to recreate the experience or make you relive it with me.” 

This approach also aligns with what admissions committees are seeking in your personal statement. From your past experiences, they want to learn more about your potential and character. Show them how a recent discovery helped you evolve, how you’ve refined your abilities in innovation and/or leadership, and/or teamwork. Prove to them that you are ready to pursue a graduate education and career path.

Below, we’ve compiled a few other takeaways from Marion Roach Smith’s approach to memoir that will help you craft a strong personal statement. Also, be sure to check out her memoir manifesto. 

  1. Structure. Memoir is created out of three components. Prior to writing, sit down and consider the building blocks of your piece. 1) What is this about (think: universal, e.g., connecting with and empowering your team, trying and trying again to find the right approach to solve a complex problem)? 2) What is your argument (something that you learned based on your experience)? 3) What experiences from your life will you deploy to prove your argument? 

  2. Think small. Memoir requires that you share your growth with the audience, which can be done effectively by incorporating small details. Smith notes the power of observation for showing the reader your journey to transcendence. She writes, “Never forget about the small stuff and how it reveals the big stuff of life.” Small details also create a relationship with your reader, drawing them into the experience. 

  3. Don’t forget your audience. Your memoir should hit on universal themes that are relatable to the reader. When you’re writing, and more importantly editing and rewriting, keep in mind how your audience will take in what you’re saying. Did you provide enough detail of the experiences to show growth and to make your argument? Did you provide too much or extraneous detail? Were you vulnerable and honest in your writing? 

  4. Keep it tight. Focus only on the experiences, sentences, and words that you absolutely need to support your argument and demonstrate your growth in the piece. You want to go deep, not broad. Adding in additional stories can distract the reader, and potentially lose them. Once you have demonstrated growth and made your argument, your personal statement is complete. Fight the urge to turn it into an autobiography or a resume.

How to Get High-Quality Letters of Recommendation

Good news! No one who hates you will agree to write you a Letter of Recommendation. It's too annoying of a task to bother with if you don't have nice things to say about someone. Still, some letters can be lackluster, especially if they're rushed. There are ways to make sure that recommenders are talking you up.

Depending on the school, you'll need four to 10 LORs. But if a school asks for a minimum of four, honestly, that is too few to submit. Eight is great. The more quality endorsements of your candidacy, the stronger your application. And having people from different arenas saying that you're someone they respect proves that you are just crushing it. 

When to Ask:

Decide who to ask for a recommendation letter six to eight months before your applications are due, so you're requesting them in January or February at the latest. If you're choosing the right people, they're successful and busy. Give them the maximum time to consider what they want to say about you. 

Who to Ask:

The schools will let you know who they want to hear from here, we share why they want those recommenders and why you should go a step beyond a school's expectations. Aim for:

At least two science professors. Medical schools want to know: Do you have a dedication to and talent for scientific study? A school might request one or two science professors as recommenders. You should use two as references even if the school doesn't require two. Have three? Even better. A science TA who knows you well can write one of these letters—if the professor cosigns it. 

At least one non-science professor. Having this in your packet shows you're well-rounded. Doing notably well in a literature, social science, or math course shows a school that broader learning is important to you. A reference from a liberal art or language professor can emphasize different strengths than those you've shown in your science courses or a consistent strength across subject matters. 

Medical professionals. If you have had a clinical, shadowing, or lab experience where you connected with a medical professional, they're a terrific option for a LOR. You don't have to stick to M.D.s; osteopathic physicians, nurse practitioners, EMTs, medical students—anyone who supervised you is gold. If you're applying to osteopathic medical school, you need an osteopathic physician as a reference. 

You want these letters to be personal, so it's better to choose someone who was a true mentor and/or saw you in action over a chief of surgery or research lead who barely knows you. Personal beats prestige here. 

Supervisors. Supervisors at your job, volunteer posts, and extracurricular activities are strong options. These people have seen you dedicate yourself to something. They've also likely seen you collaborate and work under pressure. Unlike your science professors and medical professionals, these individuals may have never written a recommendation letter for medical school before. In addition to refreshing their memory of your achievements, tell them what qualities medical schools are looking for so that they can highlight those. 

Attributes they might touch on: Leadership, compassion and sensitivity, strong communication skills, critical, creative thinking ability, work ethic, and professionalism. 

How to Ask:

Individualize your approach. What do you know about your potential recommender? Are they someone who will want a face-to-face conversation about this? Or are they someone who will be open to an email with an updated CV attached? 

Remind them of your accomplishments. You're not telling them what to write—and they may well choose to highlight some of your other victories or qualities—but offering them a refresher to reference will make your request less of a burden. Science professors know the drill of writing medical school references, but they have a lot of other students, so a reminder of what you've done is still appreciated. Ex. "It was a privilege to be in a graduate course as an undergraduate. Attending office hours deepened my understanding of the material. I'm proud to have earned an A on both the midterm and final exam. And leading my final group presentation improved my research skills and made me a better collaborator." 

You want to tell a superior at a clinical experience what it meant to you to be there and how you thrived in that job. Ex. "Your recommendation would mean so much to me because this job reinforced my goal to become a physician. Working on the COVID-19 clinical research study made me feel like a part of the hospital team and taught me how medicine approaches novel diseases. Interacting with dozens of patients improved my communication skills." OR "Working as a scribe in the ER enhanced my ability to focus in a hectic environment. Serving as senior medical scribe has meant serving as a mentor for the first time. Since my promotion in June, I have led weekly meetings and made myself available to newer staff over email and text."

And again, if you're asking for a recommendation from someone who has never written one, loop them in on the qualities that medical schools are looking for and how you've exemplified them. Ex. "The schools that I am applying to emphasize leadership and collaboration. I believe that my final group project on the early work of Chaucer showed my abilities in those areas."

Go beyond the ask. After someone agrees to be your recommender, you're going to send them a "game plan" that gets into the experiences you had and your accomplishments in greater depth than you did in your initial request. For example, the student who highlighted the Chaucer project can remind their professor what aspects of the presentation they worked on and reiterate that they organized the group's study sessions. The applicant who was a medical scribe should list their daily duties and talk about some of their most poignant or analytical learning experiences. You get the gist. If you're not sure what to include, an Apply Point advisor can help you pull specific details from your experiences.

Say thank you in a unique way. Once someone has agreed to write your recommendation, do something nice for them. Send a memorable note, maybe even a small gift (a bottle of wine or some candy is nice, if you know they partake) or offer to take them to lunch. This is common courtesy, but it's also going to remind them to submit their letter on time. 

A Note for Reapplicants:

If you're reapplying to medical school, you can use the same letters of recommendation, but you'll need to resubmit them. AMCAS does not keep old letters on file.  

A Tip for the Early Birds:

If you're a college sophomore and there's a current professor who you'd love to support your candidacy for medical school, ask for the letter of recommendation right after the course ends. The pre-health office will hold the letter until you are ready to apply. If your school doesn't have a pre-health office, you can request an advisor from the National Association of Advisors for the Health Professions (NAAHP). You can also use a letter service such as Interfolio or VirtualEvals. They can deliver your reference when it's time to submit. If your ideal recommender says, "I'll write it the year you apply," stay in touch and keep them updated on your accomplishments.

When to Get a Letter of Support:

You might know someone who has a connection to a particular school. Instead of a letter of recommendation to all your schools, they can send a "letter of support" to the school that especially values them. A letter of support is sent entirely separately from your application. They'll just pop it in the mail or send an email. The most influential writers will be tenured professors, someone on the board of trustees, or a significant donor. 

The 2023-2024 Allopathic Medical School Application: An Overview with Suggested Timing

If you’re looking to start medical school in the Fall of 2024, now is the time to get started with the application process! Applying to medical school is arduous, but with proper planning, you can reduce your stress and maintain a manageable task load.

The four components of the medical school application include:

  1. Standardized tests: MCAT and CASPer

  2. AMCAS application 

  3. Secondary Applications

  4. Interviews

Standardized Tests: 

MCAT: Your MCAT scores are typically valid for three years prior to matriculation, and you can take the exam up to three times.

  • Register: Select your preferred date, as well as a few alternative dates that would work. You can register for the test here. The ten day deadline prior to the test is your last opportunity to schedule, reschedule, or cancel. 

  • Prep: Start preparing for the MCAT at least six months prior to your planned test date.

  • Sit for the exam no later than May 26, 2023 (scores released June 27): This will avoid application delays. Keep in mind that we actually recommend that you take your final exam by mid-April so that you can re-direct your attention to preparing the AMCAS application. 

Review our blog post on Retaking the MCAT.

CASPer: This test gauges your ability to critically evaluate complex scenarios and employ sound judgment and communication skills. Not all medical schools require applicants to take the CASPer, however, a growing number of allopathic programs do, currently over 40. Your CASPer score is generally only valid for one application cycle. 

The CASPer score is often requested alongside your secondary application or prior to an invitation to interview. Opting to take the test earlier in the cycle, rather than later, will allow you to have your scores readily available when requested, meaning that you can dedicate that time to preparing your secondary application materials or for mock interviews. It will also ensure that your application is not delayed as you wait for your scores. 

Review our blog post on CASPer.

AMCAS Application: Submit no later than mid-June.

  • AMCAS application opens and will be available here on May 2, 2023.

  • First date to submit AMCAS application: May 30, 2023

  • First date that processed applications will be released to medical schools: June 30, 2023

We recommend that you submit your application in early to mid-June because your application will go through a verification process prior to the data being released to medical schools. This can take anywhere from a couple of weeks early in the process, to over a month during peak application submission periods. Note, in order to complete verification, your application must contain your official transcript, so request this document as well as your letters of recommendation a month or two before your planned submission date (by March 30, 2023). 

You also want to submit your AMCAS application early because this step triggers schools to send out secondary application materials, either automatically, or after a pre-screen of your application. 

Review our blog posts on the AMCAS application:

How to Get High-Quality Letters of Recommendation

Set Yourself Apart with a Compelling Medical School Personal Statement

The Medical School Application: Key Tips to Consider Before you Begin Drafting the Work and Activities Section

AMCAS Work & Activities Section: Hobbies

2024 AMCAS Work & Activities Section Will Include New Experience Category: Social Justice/Advocacy

AMCAS 2024: “Disadvantaged Applicant” Question Revised to Broader Adversity Question

Secondary Applications: Submit within two weeks of receipt.

Secondary applications are typically sent between June and August, although they can come later depending upon the timing of your AMCAS submission. Many schools will not review your application file until you have submitted your secondary application. And, because most schools review applications on a rolling basis, and invite applicants to interview accordingly, it is important to send in your secondary application materials promptly. 

Additionally, because many of the schools will use at least some of the same prompts, you can start preparing responses to the most commonly asked questions as soon as you’ve submitted your AMCAS application. 

Review our blog post on common secondary application questions. 

Medical School Interviews: Fall through Spring (invitation only)

Many applicants receive invitations to interview following their submission of secondary applications and/or CASPer test scores. Schedule yours as early as possible. And before solidifying your travel plans, you should contact nearby schools to which you’ve applied and let them know you have an interview in the area in case they have availability. This serves the dual purpose of letting the other school know that you are “in demand,” while also showcasing your strong interest in their program.

Review our blog posts on this topic:

The Medical School Interview

The Medical School Interview: Preparing for the Traditional One-on-One Interview

The Medical School Interview: Preparing for the Multiple Mini Interview (MMI)

The Medical School Post-Interview Thank You Note


More Medical Schools Announce Withdrawal from U.S. News Rankings

A week after Harvard Medical School announced its plan to withdraw from the U.S. News Best Medical Schools Ranking, other prestigious programs followed including Columbia’s College of Physicians and Surgeons, Stanford Medical School, Penn’s School of Medicine, and the Icahn School of Medicine

In announcing their decisions to withdraw from the rankings, the schools—in line with Harvard—all noted that the U.S. News’ ranking methodology is no longer in line with their values. The Deans at Columbia, Penn, and Icahn also specifically called out the methodology’s negative effect on building a diverse and inclusive medical class. Dr. Katrina Armstrong, MD and Dean of Columbia’s Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, wrote, “The USNWR medical school rankings perpetuate a narrow and elitist perspective on medical education. Their emphasis is on self-reinforcing criteria such as reputation and institutional wealth, rather than measuring a school’s success in educating a diverse and well-trained cohort of doctors able to change medicine for the better and meet society’s needs.”

Each of the schools noted the value that comes from data transparency and they committed to making data available for prospective applicants. 

Worried About Medical School Debt? Financial Advisors Weigh In.

Medscape’s 2022 Medical Student Lifestyle Report found that med students’ top concerns deal with managing finances, debt, and contracts. As a follow-up to these findings, Medscape ran a poll of medical students to learn more about their financial issues. Over two-thirds (68 percent) of the 151 respondents said that they always/often worry about finances. Among first- and second-year med students, this percentage jumps to 75. Over half said that they are confused about money and only 42 percent—just 26 percent of female respondents—said that they feel prepared to manage their finances.

Most students named debt as their primary concern (86 percent). This was followed by investments (52 percent), contracts (27 percent) and business operations (16 percent). Some addressed their difficulty in balancing spending for necessities and “fun” items, and cited issues with budgeting for the residency application process in the fourth year. 

Financial planner and advisor to young doctors, Paul Morton, spoke with Medscape, noting that medical students are often asked to make binding decisions, many of which they don’t feel confident making, about loans and investments. He also acknowledged that student loan rules have become more complex.

James Nutter, Director of Client Experience for IM Wealth, also spoke with Medscape and reassured medical students that loans for medical school are a remarkably safe investment for their future.

In addition, he encourages medical students to consider the following:

  • Examine your relationship with money. Are you being overly influenced by your childhood experiences, your parents struggle with money, or other external factors such as social media? What personal experiences may be driving or coloring your spending behaviors?

  • Take note of exactly how you spend your money on a monthly basis. What types of items are buying? Detailed knowledge of your spending habits can inform how much you need to borrow.

  • Identify three core values, and spend your money in ways that align with those values. This will help to reduce the noise of external pressures on your spending and ensure that your spending is reflective of who you are.  

Harvard Medical School Withdraws from the U.S. News Medical School Ranking

Harvard Medical School’s Dean, Dr. George Daley, just announced this morning that the school will no longer participate in the U.S. News & World Report “Best Medical Schools” ranking. 

In an open letter to the Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Dental Medicine community, Daley noted that his concerns rest not simply on criticisms of the ranking methodology, but more fundamentally on his, “... principled belief that rankings cannot meaningfully reflect the high aspirations for educational excellence, graduate preparedness, and compassionate and equitable patient care that we strive to foster in our medical education programs.” He also described the negative unintended consequences that he sees rankings promoting within academic institutions, which include schools reporting false or misleading data, creating policies intended to boost rankings rather than educational objectives, and emphasizing financial aid for recipients based on scores rather than financial need. Daley noted that while he has contemplated this move for years, the “courageous and bold moves” made by leaders within the law school community—including Harvard Law’s Dean, John Manning—have “compelled” him to act now. 

Daley did acknowledge the need for data and transparency for prospective medical students, and urged them to review the data shared on the HMS admissions website. He also recommended the AAMC MSAR database, which contains meaningful data for all U.S. medical schools.

Related: Former Medical School Deans Call on Medical Schools to Withdraw from the U.S. News Ranking

Thinking of Retaking the MCAT? Here’s What You Need to Know.

It is not unusual to retake the MCAT. Data from the AAMC shows that between 2019 and 2021, 38 percent of test-takers were “repeaters,” who had taken the test at least once before. And “repeaters” tended to achieve score improvements. 

--Those with an initial score between 472 and 517 saw a median score increase between two to four points. 

--Those with an initial score between 518 and 528 saw a median score increase of one point.

The analysis also found that the longer the period between your first and second exam, the bigger the point gain. Many factors likely play into this, one of them being as simple as completing helpful college or postgraduate coursework. 

How many times can I take the MCAT?

You can take the MCAT up to three times in one calendar year and four times across two calendar years. There is a lifetime cap of seven times. We recommend taking the MCAT a maximum of three times—really, you should aim for two. Medical schools prefer it. 

How do schools use updated MCAT scores? Will they use my best score?

Different schools use different strategies for multiple score submissions. In an AAMC admissions officer survey (2017), representatives mentioned the following methods: 

  • Review all submitted scores in conjunction with respondent’s explanation of the score change

  • Use only the highest score

  • Average all of the submitted scores

  • Use only the most recent score 

If you are considering retaking the test in order to target a particular school, we recommend that you contact the admissions office first to ask how they will use the updated MCAT score. This is because achieving a particular score can be more challenging if a school averages the submitted scores, rather than using either the best or most recent exam result.

What do I need to consider as I think about retaking the MCAT?

--First and foremost: is it necessary to retake the test? 

Review the average MCAT scores for the schools that you are interested in. Are you within the average range of scores at your desired schools? Would you consider adding schools to your list that do match your performance? 

If you fall below the average for your target schools and you do not want to reconsider your school list, you will likely need to retake the test. MCAT scores are often used as a preliminary filter for secondary applications. 

--How are the other components of your application?

A low or borderline GPA creates a stronger case for retaking the MCAT. You want to be sure that your application demonstrates your ability to thrive in a rigorous academic environment, so if both scores are on the low end, you should consider how to bolster at least one of them by retaking the exam or taking additional classes. 

--Is it clear why you didn’t achieve the score you had expected and/or do you understand how to improve your test prep process?

Is your score much lower than your practice exams? Did you have a stressful situation or an illness that impacted your performance? Is there good reason to believe that with some changes in your preparation, such as hiring a tutor, you will do better on the test? If you only achieved a point or two below your typical practice exams, do you have a plan to reinvigorate your efforts? If you do retake the exam, you’ll want to improve your score. So, consider carefully if you have a clear path to do so.

--Do you have the time to retake the test?

If you retake the test, you’ll want to commit to a study plan that will ensure you improve your initial score. Doing so will take time away from other endeavors including extracurricular activities, research, and clinical experiences. Consider your overall application and where you are most likely to benefit by spending time. 

We encourage you to make the decision that will best help you to meet your goals. You will need to achieve an MCAT score high enough to keep you in the running for the schools that you’re interested in. But you’ll want to balance that with gaining other meaningful experiences that will also prepare you for medical school. Admissions committees review applications holistically because they’re looking for great candidates, not perfect ones.

Former Medical School Deans Call on Medical Schools to Withdraw from the U.S. News Ranking

A recent Stat News op-ed, co-written by former University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine leaders, is calling on medical schools to follow Yale, Harvard, and other leading law schools in withdrawing from participation in the U.S. News rankings. The authors, Holly Humphrey, a physician and current President of the Macy Foundation, and Dana Levinson, Chief Program Officer of the Macy Foundation contend that the current U.S. News ranking system, “is in direct opposition to medical schools’ goal of educating a well-trained, diverse, and culturally competent medical workforce.” 

Humphrey and Levinson argue that the rankings’ methodology is “ill conceived” and fails to include critical output metrics. The two claim that, across most included metrics, the data tends to favor large and wealthy institutions over smaller ones with no clear demonstration of how each metric directly benefits student education. For example, the inclusion of total federal research dollars favors larger institutions, although that money may or may not directly fund students’ education or participation in the research. The authors also note that the survey response rate, which drives the reputation score, falls far below the standard of a peer-reviewed publication. Additionally, the use of average MCAT scores and undergraduate GPAs unduly advantages schools with students from higher socioeconomic backgrounds as well as incorporates bias that may exist in the educational system. Finally, Humphrey and Levinson note that including the acceptance rate in the rankings can lead a school to encourage applicants to submit applications, regardless of if those applicants have a reasonable likelihood of admissions success. 

The authors also point out what is missing from the rankings. Namely, data on the quality of the education including the clinical skills, scientific acumen, and abilities of a schools’ graduates. The authors’ position, which is in line with that of Yale and Harvard Law, is that the rankings are not just potentially misleading but that in some cases they actually do a “grave disservice” to applicants by reinforcing bias or poor admissions practices. Humphrey and Levinson believe that if medical schools take the step of removing themselves from the rankings, they can play a more “honest and forthright” role in assisting applicants as they “...navigate the process of finding the right school to help them become the doctors they aspire to be.”

Related: Medical Community Lauds Addition of Public Health Priorities to Methodology of U.S. News’ Medical Rankings